The Supreme Court’s War on the FutureA Dig curated by Bill Blum
This is the concluding feature story in the multi-part Dig series, “The Supreme Court’s War on the Future,” investigating how the Supreme Court was remade in the image of Robert Bork.
The radical right’s long crusade to capture the Supreme Court is over. Anyone who doesn’t realize this hasn’t been paying attention, or has imbibed the Kool-Aid served by Chief Justice John Roberts at his 2005 Senate confirmation hearing, when he promised to work as a neutral arbiter on the bench much like a baseball umpire, calling only “balls and strike, and not to pitch or bat.”Dig deeper Dec 19, 2022 How the Supreme Court was remade in the image of the original Originalist.
This is the first of a multi-part Dig series, The Supreme Court’s War on the Future, investigating how the Supreme Court was remade in the image of Robert Bork.
The Supreme Court and the Road to Minority Rule
We like to think of the Supreme Court as the guardian of fairness, protector of the little guy and upholder of the rule of law. It isn’t. With the exception of the Warren Court era and its immediate aftermath, throughout most of our history, the court has been the protector of the wealthy and the powerful, a defender of slavery (Dred Scott), racism (Plessy, Korematsu) and historical distortion (Heller on the Second Amendment). In the first article, I’ll explain how the Supreme Court has returned to its historical roots as an undemocratic, elitist and backward institution.Dig deeper Dig Discussion