Follow the Money: Big Banks, DOJ Find Benefits in Settlement Deals
The Justice Department might have talked a good game about punishing major banks like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs for their involvement in the recession that set the the U.S. economy reeling six years ago. But as Lynnley Browning explains in Newsweek there is more to the story behind the big-figure settlements […]
The Justice Department might have talked a good game about punishing major banks like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs for their involvement in the recession that set the the U.S. economy reeling six years ago. But as Lynnley Browning explains in Newsweek there is more to the story behind the big-figure settlements that the DOJ required those banks to pay:
Because settlements can be deducted from tax liabilities, for nearly every dollar a bank or lender has pledged to pay in cash or pony up in other ways—such as through buying back soured mortgage-backed securities, extending cheaper loans or forgiving failed loans held by struggling homeowners—up to 35 cents will find its way back into bank coffers, a reflection of the 35 percent federal corporate tax rate.
Deep in the legalese weeds of the settlement documents lies buried treasure. Big banks such as Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase will receive deductions against the corporate tax that will amount to between half and nearly three-quarters of their multibillion-dollar settlements, at least. Meanwhile, midsized banks and nonbank lenders generally get to deduct the whole shebang.
[…] Federal tax rules allow companies to deduct from their tax returns as an ordinary cost of doing business any settlement payments that are construed, explicitly or not, as restitution or compensation. Payments flagged as penalties or fines, typically outlined in criminal cases, are generally not deductible, as opposed to the civil settlements with banks.
Bank of America, for example, may be able to deduct around $12 billion out of the company’s $16.6 billion settlement, according to Newsweek’s calculations. Meanwhile, JPMorgan Chase could deduct at least $7 billion of its $13 billion settlement and Citigroup might deduct some $3 billion from its $7 billion deal.
Another unsettling factor in this mix has to do with what the Justice Department stands to gain by appearing to throw the books at the big banks. As Browning explains, “[t]he agency receives a cut of up to 3 percent of its share of the total settlements for its Working Capital Fund, a slush fund common across major government agencies.”
So, these hefty settlements start to look less like justice being served and more like pockets being lined.
— Posted by Donald Kaufman
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.