With Sexual Assaults Way Up, Pentagon Announces New Protections
Faced with the oversight of a new independent panel, the military has announced a plan to combat sexual assault in the ranks. Such attacks were up 37 percent in 2012, according to the Pentagon's own information.
Faced with the oversight of a new independent panel, the military has announced a plan to combat sexual assault in the ranks. Such attacks were up 37 percent in 2012, according to the Pentagon’s own information.
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said, “Sexual assault is a stain on the honor of our men and women who honorably serve our country, as well as a threat to the discipline and the cohesion of our force. It must be stamped out.”
But the military has been dragging its heels for years and the problem has gotten worse and worse. Last year, 26,000 people reported inappropriate behavior, including rape, but it is widely accepted that the number of victims is much higher.
Lt. Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, quoted by Reuters, acknowledged the predicament:
“We have to attack that because, frankly, we want increased, unrestricted reporting,” said [Scaparrotti], director of the Joint Staff. “And we can only get that if we (have) the trust of our victims.”
One reason trust is an issue is because victims are often forced to interact with their attackers, sometimes in life and death situations. One welcome change announced Thursday is that officers will be able to transfer the accused away from their alleged victims while cases are investigated. Of course that does no good if the attacker is also a commander, so another change will require that a high-ranking general officer be informed of allegations.
Stars and Stripes reports that the new policies, which come as Congress has mandated more oversight of the issue, “appear unlikely to appease lawmakers who have been calling for a dramatic overhaul of military sexual assault cases, starting with taking the legal responsibilities out of the chain of command.”
— Posted by Peter Z. Scheer
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
The appointment of lobbyist Mark Esper to lead the department should be a huge scandal. That it isn't speaks volumes about our priorities.
Just shy of three months since Chuck Hagel was obliged to vacate the position, the Obama administration has a new secretary of defense -- and Ashton Carter has his work cut out for him.
Unbelievably enough, a bankrupt 13-year-old policy of war to the horizon remains ascendant in Washington, and “war fever” seems to be breaking out yet again. In this context, it's curious that four crucial aspects of war, American-style, were missing from the blitz of Hagel reportage.
Chuck Hagel's departure from his post as defense secretary has been attributed to his failure to fit in with the Obama cabinet's crowd. Among his other reported deficiencies was that he was only a sergeant in Vietnam, twice wounded.
It's a surprise to see President Obama actually fire someone. But I have to worry that Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel's forced departure may signal further expansion of U.S. military involvement in Iraq and Syria.
I don’t see anyone talking about how the Defense Department's response to Islamic State has gone.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.