U.S. to U.N.: Drone Strikes Are ‘Necessary and Just’
The U.N. criticized the Obama administration for its drone wars and discussed the "rapidly expanding militarised use of remotely piloted aircraft and the fraught international legal issues that it raises," The Guardian reports.
The U.N. criticized the Obama administration for its drone wars and discussed the “rapidly expanding militarised use of remotely piloted aircraft and the fraught international legal issues that it raises,” The Guardian reports. It was the first such meeting between member nations on drone use.
The U.S. government was defensive at the meeting, telling the organization that drone strikes as they currently occur are “necessary, legal and just.” Brazil, China and Venezuela were among the countries that condemned President Obama. The meeting followed 10 days of inquiry into the legality of drones by media and professional groups. Two U.N. reports sharply condemned aspects of U.S. drone use.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...The Guardian:
The authors of the two reports addressed Friday’s UN debate, beginning with Christof Heyns, the UN’s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. His study warned of the danger of proliferation of the un-piloted weapons among states and terrorist groups.
… [H]e added that drones were easy to deploy across international borders, often secretly. “So it is my view that although they are not illegal, they do pose a challenge, particularly as they are used often in secret, raising accountability issues.”
The accountability theme was picked up by the second UN expert, Ben Emmerson, the special rapporteur on human rights and counter-terrorism. His ongoing investigation into lethal extra-territorial counter-terrorism operations has concluded that the 33 drone strikes that are known to have caused civilian casualties may have been carried out in violation of international law.
He told the assembled nations that lack of transparency was “the single greatest obstacle to an evaluation of the civilian impact of drone strikes and it’s a challenge which makes it extremely difficult to assess claims of precision targeting objectively”.
This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.