Pentagon Eyeing Military Option Aganst Iran
On Friday, a day after an American cargo ship fired warning shots at two small boats off the coast of Iran, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen said the Pentagon is considering various options, including military action, to deal with what he characterized as the Iranian government's "increasingly lethal and malign influence" in Iraq.
On Friday, a day after an American cargo ship fired warning shots at two small boats off the coast of Iran, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen said the Pentagon is considering various options, including military action, to deal with what he characterized as the Iranian government’s “increasingly lethal and malign influence” in Iraq.
Your support matters…The Washington Post”
“It would be a mistake to think that we are out of combat capability,” he said at a Pentagon news conference. Speaking of Iran’s intentions, Mullen said: “They prefer to see a weak Iraq neighbor. . . . They have expressed long-term goals to be the regional power.”
Mullen made clear that he prefers a diplomatic solution and does not expect imminent action. “I have no expectations that we’re going to get into a conflict with Iran in the immediate future,” he said.
Mullen’s statements and others by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates recently signal new rhetorical pressure on Iran by the Bush administration amid what officials say is increased Iranian provision of weapons, training and financing to Iraqi groups that are attacking and killing Americans.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
I doubt I’ll ever again trust the assertions and promises of the military's top brass. And I’m not in bad company.
The mostly retired military leaders are clamoring to prolong an unsanctioned war with a muddled and dubious mission in Syria.
On the 18th anniversary of he 9/11 attacks, all our political press can do is fret over our "overly hastly" withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The former secretary of defense is a military and moral failure, yet our mainstream media continues to hold him up as a model of virtue.
The 44th president failed in foreign policy and saw a rise in racial tensions: The "Hope and Change" candidate could not deliver.
The CNN pundit appears to be taking his talking points from prominent military sources.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.