Palin and Friends: The Governor Is Interviewed by Fox’s Hannity
Thank goodness there was Fox News host Sean Hannity to fill the excruciating void between Sarah Palin's big interview with ABC's Charlie Gibson and her upcoming one-on-one with CBS' Katie Couric. On Wednesday he sat down with Palin for the benefit of Fox's conservative-friendly audience.Thank goodness there was Fox News host Sean Hannity to fill the excruciating void between Sarah Palin’s big interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson and her upcoming one-on-one with CBS’ Katie Couric. On Wednesday he sat down with Palin for the benefit of Fox’s conservative-friendly audience. So how’d she do this time?
Videos courtesy of YouTube:
Part I:
Part II:
Part III:
Your support matters…Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Not so long ago, it seemed like big news that a woman -- CBS' Katie Couric -- would be chosen to anchor the nightly news at a major network. Now Couric's got some competition in Diane Sawyer, who'll replace Charlie Gibson at ABC's "World News" starting in January.
During a sit-down interview with ABC's Charlie Gibson that aired on Wednesday, Barack Obama talked about the economy and how he'd lead differently from President Bush before addressing the McCain-Palin campaign's ramped-up attacks of late. "All these statements are made simply to try to score cheap political points," Obama told Gibson.
To his credit, ABC's Charlie Gibson posed some practical and pertinent questions in the first installment of his interview with Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, and he didn't let her off the hook when she conflated "national security" with "energy independence." Updated
Why were so many journalists so aggravated by the latest presidential debate? According to Politico scribes John F. Harris and Jim VandeHei, it wasn't about George Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson's less substantive questions -- instead, the problem was that "this time there were more hard questions for Obama than for Clinton."
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.