Obama the Underdog
Stat geek Nate Silver examined approval ratings, economic indicators and the ideological zeal of the opposition and compared those factors to campaign history. His conclusion is that President Obama is "a slight underdog" to win re-election. (more)
Stat geek Nate Silver examined approval ratings, economic indicators and the ideological zeal of the opposition and compared those factors to campaign history. His conclusion is that President Obama is “a slight underdog” to win re-election.
Silver is cautious to point out that any number of developments — Michele Bachmann winning the Republican nomination, for instance — could very rapidly improve Obama’s chances at winning a second term.
Ultimately, his epic New York Times magazine piece tells us what we already know: If a president is (a) not that popular, (b) presiding over a bad economy and (c) finds himself running against a fairly mainstream opponent, he will not be favored to win — if only by a slight margin.
But Silver’s analysis is more interesting in that he debunks several commonly repeated truisms about campaign handicapping.
— PZS
(hat tip: LA Observed)
TRUTHDIG’S JOURNALISM REMAINS CLEARThe storytellers of chaos tried to manipulate the political and media narrative in 2025, but independent journalism exposed what they tried to hide. When you read Truthdig, you see through the illusion.
Support Independent Journalism.


You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.