Obama Reportedly OKs Support for Syrian Rebels
President Barack Obama earlier this year secretly authorized the CIA and other U.S. agencies to support Syrian rebels in their fight against President Bashar al-Assad, anonymous sources have told Reuters.
President Barack Obama earlier this year secretly authorized the CIA and other U.S. agencies to support Syrian rebels in their fight against President Bashar al-Assad, anonymous sources have told Reuters. The particulars of the aid, however, are unclear.
Some lawmakers have criticized the president for taking too long to support the Syrian opposition. Others have suggested caution, saying too little is known about the rebel groups.
A government source also reported that the authorization entailed U.S. collaboration with Turkey and its allies. Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have established a secret base 60 miles from Syria’s border — a “nerve center” in close proximity to an American air base to provide military and communication support to Assad’s opponents.
It does not appear that the U.S. has provided weapons to Syria’s rebels, Reuters reports. Such assistance would be legal only if the president approved an additional supplement known as a “memorandum of notification.”
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Wait, before you go…Reuters via The Guardian:
This and other developments point to growing support for Assad’s armed opponents – which has intensified following last month’s failure by the UN security council to agree on tougher sanctions against the Damascus government.
The White House is for now apparently stopping short of arming the rebels directly, even though some US allies are.
But US and European officials have said that there have been noticeable improvements in the coherence and effectiveness of Syrian rebel groups in the past few weeks. That represents a significant change in assessments of the rebels by western officials, who previously characterised Assad’s opponents as a disorganised, chaotic, rabble.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
A closer look at the Trump administration's agreement with the Taliban reveals all the president's concerned with is bragging rights.
The agreement could see the withdrawal of all American and allied forces in the next 14 months — but it could also easily unravel.
The pact sets the stage for U.S. troop withdrawal more than 18 years after George W. Bush ordered bombing in response to the 9/11 attacks.
The planned Feb. 29 signing depends on the success of a week-long nationwide "reduction in violence" agreement.
The offensive, part of a Russian-backed military assault, is displacing hundreds of thousands who are fleeing to safer areas.
A spokesman for the Sunni Muslim group says the assault is not related to the death of Iran's Qassem Soleimani.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.