Half of Med Students Study With Wikipedia
The somewhat unsettling results of a recent study of 186 medical students suggest that roughly half of all surgeons, general physicians and other doctors-in-training view Wikipedia as a reliable source of medical information and regularly use it to prepare for exams. (more)
The somewhat unsettling results of a recent study of 186 medical students suggest that roughly half of all surgeons, general physicians and other doctors-in-training view Wikipedia as a reliable source of medical information and regularly use it to prepare for exams.
To ensure the accuracy of research results and educational materials, every serious academic community enforces a rigorous peer review process. While Wikipedia’s content is regularly evaluated by a team of editors, the site’s tag line, “The free encyclopedia that anyone can edit,” is less than assuring in this instance. –ARK
Your support matters…MedPage Today:
Although study groups and preparation guides proved more popular methods of studying, 46.77% of 186 med students surveyed said they referred to the publicly maintained Wikipedia as a primary source of knowledge, Maryam Namdari, DO, who practices in Philadelphia, and colleagues reported at the American Psychiatric Association meeting here.
… Although 46.77% of students said they relied on Wikipedia, Namdari said she thinks this is an underestimate because students may be less likely to admit to using the website on a survey.
… And, she explained, students who cited Wikipedia as a study aid did not rely solely on it — 83.9% of Wikipedia users also turned to question books while, 65.51% used Wikipedia, question books and Up-to-Date.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Book Excerpt
Seventy-five years ago in Chicago, a conservative project was hatched to cure classical economics of its aversion to patents and monopolies. The drug companies were its first and biggest beneficiaries.
Alongside scientifically proven treatments, an industry has sprung up in which clinics offer miracle remedies from stem cell products.
It’s time society took seriously the care and protection of its most vulnerable citizens.
The dean of Yale’s medical school is among leading medical figures who have not accurately disclosed relationships with drug companies.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.