Goldman Sachs Posts $1.9 Billion Loss Due to New Tax Law
It is the investment bank's first quarterly loss in more than six years.NEW YORK—Goldman Sachs posted a $1.93 billion loss in the fourth quarter, the investment bank said Wednesday, as the bank had to record more than $4 billion in charges related to the new tax law. It was the bank’s first quarterly loss in more than six years.
Goldman had a net loss of $5.51 a share, compared with a profit of $2.35 billion, or $5.08 a share, in the same period a year earlier. Excluding the one-time charges, however, the bank earned $5.68 a share, beating analysts’ estimates.
Like other banks, Goldman had to write down billions in assets impacted by the new tax law this quarter, resulting in the quarterly loss. It had $3.32 billion in charges related to foreign earnings now taxable under the law and $1.1 billion in charges for deferred tax assets it stockpiled after the financial crisis.
Firm-wide, net revenues at Goldman were $7.83 billion versus $8.17 billion a year earlier.
Outside of the impact of the tax bill, Goldman’s results were hurt by a relatively weak performance on its trading desks, typically one of Goldman’s strongest businesses.
The segment inside Goldman that contains its trading operations had net revenues of $2.37 billion in the fourth quarter, down 34 percent from a year earlier. Fixed income, currencies and commodities trading net revenues were down by 50 percent from a year earlier.
The firm’s advisory businesses, however, made up for the weak performance in trading. Investment banking net revenues totaled $2.14 billion, up 44 percent from a year earlier.
The bank set aside less money per employee for compensation than it had in the past, likely due to the weak performance on its trading desks. Goldman Sachs’ pay structure relies heavily on giving annual bonuses to employees based on performance. So while compensation expenses in the full year rose to $11.85 billion, up 2 percent from a year earlier, Goldman said it had six percent more staff than it did a year ago.
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Economic Justice
Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) and J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) have joined forces in a rare bipartisan effort to make top executives pay for their mistakes.
Lessons learned from the 2008 financial crisis show that taxpayer-funded blank checks to institutions do nothing to help those struggling
Because our banks aren't nationalized, its inability to work with Congress has resulted in another botched attempt at crisis management.
Its forced choice to bankroll hedge funds and other speculative ventures in repo market comes at a price to the middle class.
The Massachusetts senator and Democratic presidential contender wants to make it harder for big banks to prey on consumers.
The threat of a U.S. technology company taking up the model set by China's WeChat Pay and Alipay may now be materializing.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.