FBI Gets Go-Ahead to Review Latest Batch of Emails in Clinton Case, as Political Feuds RoilHere's the least surprising news of the day: James Comey's announcement of his agency's new investigation has sparked a highly politicized battle within the U.S. government.
Here’s the least surprising news of the day: FBI Director James Comey’s announcement of the investigation into the latest batch of emails in Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s case has sparked a highly politicized battle within the U.S. government — with just over a week to go before the Nov. 8 presidential election.
His agency has obtained a warrant to begin sifting through some 650,000 emails stored on a computer shared by embattled former Congressman Anthony Weiner and his estranged wife, Clinton aide Huma Abedin, to determine whether any were sent to or from Clinton’s private server or contained classified material. According to The Wall Street Journal, the FBI, which learned of the newly discovered emails in early October, had already been dealing with internal tensions before this latest development occurred:
The new investigative effort, disclosed by FBI Director James Comey on Friday, shows a bureau at times in sharp internal disagreement over matters related to the Clintons, and how to handle those matters fairly and carefully in the middle of a national election campaign. Even as the probe of Mrs. Clinton’s email use wound down in July, internal disagreements within the bureau and the Justice Department surrounding the Clintons’ family philanthropy heated up, according to people familiar with the matter.
Comey’s move was instantly framed by mainstream outlets as a “bombshell” after the story broke Friday. Predictably, Clinton’s camp questioned its timing and the hype it caused and called for details, and GOP nominee Donald Trump swiftly seized upon the story as further evidence of what he calls his rival’s corruption.
Outgoing Nevada Sen. Harry Reid echoed a former White House ethics lawyer in the George W. Bush administration, Richard W. Painter, who in a New York Times op-ed published Sunday suggested that Comey may have violated the Hatch Act and wrote that he had filed a formal complaint through government channels:
The F.B.I.’s job is to investigate, not to influence the outcome of an election.
Such acts could also be prohibited under the Hatch Act, which bars the use of an official position to influence an election. That is why the F.B.I. presumably would keep those aspects of an investigation confidential until after the election. The usual penalty for a violation is termination of federal employment.
That is why, on Saturday, I filed a complaint against the F.B.I. with the Office of Special Counsel, which investigates Hatch Act violations, and with the Office of Government Ethics. I spent much of my career working on government and lawyers’ ethics, including as the chief White House ethics lawyer for George W. Bush. I never thought that the F.B.I. could be dragged into a political circus surrounding one of its investigations. Until this week.
(For the sake of full disclosure, in this election I have supported Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, John Kasich and Hillary Clinton for president, in that order.)
Painter added that considerations of intent are immaterial when it comes to Hatch Act violations; rather, emphasis is on the possible outcome — on whether it is clear that the official in question could sway the election.
Reid had this to say about Comey and the Hatch Act:
“Your actions in recent months have demonstrated a disturbing double standard for the treatment of sensitive information, with what appears to be clear intent to aid one political party over another,” the letter says. “I am writing to inform you that my office has determined that these actions may violate the Hatch Act.” …
Reid also accused Comey of shielding Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump from scrutiny over his connections to Russia, saying “it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination” between Trump and his advisers and the Russian government.
Although FBI investigators have eight full days before the presidential election to scrutinize the contents of Weiner and Abedin’s laptop, the review is likely to take weeks.
–Posted by Kasia Anderson
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.Support Truthdig
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.