FBI Admits Lack of Data on Police Shootings Is ‘Embarrassing,’ ‘Ridiculous’
Director James Comey says The Guardian and The Washington Post are doing a better job of tracking information than the U.S. government.
By Adam Johnson, AlterNet
At a private gathering held on Wednesday of more than a 100 law enforcement officials and politicians, FBI Director James Comey addressed the FBI’s lack of data on shootings by local police.
“It is unacceptable that The Washington Post and the Guardian newspaper from the U.K. are becoming the lead source of information about violent encounters between police and civilians. That is not good for anybody.” Comey said, according to The Washington Post.
Currently, the FBI’s tracking system for local police shootings is entirely voluntary. Only 18,000 police departments participate, or roughly 3% of the national total, rendering the system statistically meaningless. The Guardian’s database shows 891 have been killed thus far in 2015 while The Washington Post currently shows the number to be 758. This is more than double what the FBI’s figures are.
“You can get online today and figure out how many tickets were sold to ‘The Martian,'” Comey said, according to the Post. “The CDC can do the same with the flu. It’s ridiculous — it’s embarrassing and ridiculous — that we can’t talk about crime in the same way, especially in the high-stakes incidents when your officers have to use force.”
Despite the rhetoric, it’s unclear if Comey recommends any specific legislation, though it appears the sentiment at the meeting was in favor of reform. The FBI, for its part, has been hesitant to use its authority to investigate local police shootings; they’ve yet to intervene in any high-profile police killings since the Black Lives Matter movement emerged in 2013.
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
Why should banks ever be permitted to use customers' deposits—insured by the federal government—to place risky bets on the banks’ own behalf?
A corporate censorship is being imposed, inch by inch, step by step. It begins by silencing the demonized. It ends by silencing everyone.
Although the property destruction during the Philadelphia riots after the Eagles' Super Bowl win was similar to damage caused by protests against police killings of young black men over the years, only the latter is regularly called “violence.”
Google, Facebook and other companies are “protecting” us by imposing a censorship that drains the remaining blood of democracy and free expression.
The president's own shortcomings are no excuse for his appointee’s vandalism of State. The damage the former fossil fuel magnate has done is visible around the world.
Independent media outlets like Truthdig, AlterNet and more are fighting the loss of readership due to "Goliath Google."
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.