Economist Galbraith on Why Public Welfare Programs Are Sustainable
Is there ever a good time to cut “entitlements” -- the code word used by austerity hawks to refer to and demean publicly funded social welfare programs -- host Andrew Ross Sorkin asked University of Texas economist James K. Galbraith on CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Friday.
Is there ever a good time to cut “entitlements” — the code word used by austerity hawks to refer to and demean publicly funded social welfare programs — host Andrew Ross Sorkin asked University of Texas economist James K. Galbraith on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Friday.
“I don’t think it’s a good idea from the standpoint of the future of the American economy, to reduce the security that people expect in their old age,” Galbraith responded. “We’re talking about Social Security here, we’re talking about Medicare, we’re talking about Medicaid. These are foundations for the future life of most of the working population of the country at the moment. If you cut them, people will draw back in their current activity, at least to some degree. So you’re basically saying ‘We’re gonna do something which will squeeze people’s living standards out in the future.’ It will not have any direct effect today on economic activity except to the extent that people will react to that by deleveraging more and saving more.”
But can this arrangement be maintained?
“If the average American is putting into the system, let’s say $100,000 to $130,000 in their lifetime,” Sorkin said, “and yet through Medicare, Medicaid and other entitlements is taking out something on the order of $300,000 to $400,000 — that’s clearly an unsustainable model, right?
“No it’s not unsustainable,” Galbraith answered. “Because when they take that out in the future, they will be taking it out from a much more productive economy that we expect to have at that time. So there’s really no reason to be scared by that kind of comparison, in fact.”
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
CNBC:
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
The budget proposal offers a terrifying preview of what we can expect from Trump if he wins another four years in office.
The former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, draws fire for claiming it's "not fashionable in progressive circles" to talk about the deficit.
Iraqis are demanding an end to corruption and sectarianism, while also objecting U.S. troops and Iranian influence.
From Chile to Iraq, popular uprisings against austerity and corruption are spreading like wildfire at a crucial point in history.
Working people are rising up against austerity, yet our political press only sees fit to describe the threat they pose to law and order.
A U.N. health expert warns increasing inequality is taking a steep psychological toll on the U.S., the U.K. and nations across the West.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.