AARP Backpedals on Cuts in Social Security
Spokespersons for the AARP are in damage control mode after The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the organization, which claims to lobby on behalf of older Americans, "is dropping its longstanding opposition to cutting Social Security benefits." (more)
Spokespersons for the AARP are in damage control mode after The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the organization, which claims to lobby on behalf of older Americans, “is dropping its longstanding opposition to cutting Social Security benefits.”
The group now states that it is opposed to the inclusion of cuts to Social Security in the debt ceiling debate, but has made it clear that it is open to other adjustments in the way seniors’ benefits are calculated. Shocked and angry critics say the proposed changes will have the same impact as straightforward cuts: reducing the amount of financial help retired seniors receive. –ARK
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...The Huffington Post:
While AARP says it is adamantly opposed to having Social Security in the debt ceiling discussion, the group is open to separate negotiations on changes in things like the retirement age or the formula for calculating benefits to maintain the long-term solvency of the Social Security trust fund. Such changes are tantamount to benefit cuts if they reduce the total amount retirees receive.
The $2.6 trillion Social Security trust fund is on pace to run out of money in 2036, at which point incoming payroll contributions will only be able to pay 77 percent of promised benefits. As of April, 35 million seniors received Social Security retirement benefits averaging $1,179 a month, according to the program’s latest monthly snapshot.
… AARP says it is willing to negotiate possible benefit cuts, so long as they are not tied to the larger debt reduction negotiations — and that it has always been open to reducing benefits. This came as a shock to several other Social Security advocates. Alliance for Retired Americans Executive Director Ed Coyle said if AARP had been open to cuts all along, “to me, that’s news.”
This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
AARP magazine, which boasts the largest circulation of any periodical in the world, used to focus on injustice, something it now calls "negativity."
If Mitt Romney was waiting for a change of subject before releasing more tax returns, this Friday of a week-from-hell was that day. His 2011 return shows him to be the kind of guy who does not take all the deductions to which he's entitled. The "Left, Right & Center" commentators consider this and other matters on this week's show.
A look at the day's political happenings, including the latest swing state polls, why Paul Ryan was booed at the annual AARP conference and "Saturday Night Live" pokes fun at Mitt Romney's "47 percent" comment in prime time.
Who knew that Reese Witherspoon window-shops for shoes? Or that Ben Affleck glues elaborate doll houses together? Or that Jeremy Piven eats what appears to be gruel on a lush outdoor patio? These intimate celebrity vignettes were captured for the AARP's ad campaign for its "Divided We Fail" intiative calling for "red, blue liberal, conservative" (and, apparently, "rich, famous") Americans to unite for the causes of health care and long-term financial security.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.