New York Doesn’t Heart Body Scanners
The backlash against the new mandatory screening regime at airports continues At least one New York City Council member is trying to have body scanners banned from local airports But does the city have the authority? Says Councilman David Greenfield, " If the TSA disagrees with us, they can sue us".
The backlash against the new mandatory screening regime at airports continues. At least one New York City Council member is trying to have body scanners banned from local airports. But does the city have the authority? Says Councilman David Greenfield, “… If the TSA disagrees with us, they can sue us.”
Your support matters…Wired:
Federal law gives the TSA jurisdiction over airline security, but Greenfield says he believes the city has the authority to prohibit a particular type of screening.
“The city owns the airports,” says Greenfield. “They’re operated by the Port Authority. … Hopefully we’ll get the law passed soon, and if the TSA disagrees with us, they can sue us.”
The TSA had no immediate comment Thursday.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
The ruling against the government cites the Paris Agreement and block plans to add a third runway at Europe's biggest travel hub.
Iranian officials cite mechanical problem but Ukrainians decline to offer a cause after plane goes down shortly after takeoff from Tehran.
The ruling in Boston strengthens the protections of international travelers and their electronics at airports and other ports of entry.
Aviation industry union leaders issue harsh warnings to President Donald Trump, Congress and the traveling public.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.