Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 18, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

Star-Spangled Baggage
Science Finds New Routes to Energy




The Divide


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Arts and Culture

God of the Oppressed

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 21, 2011

Excerpted from “The Cross and the Lynching Tree” by James H. Cone.

To live meaningfully, we must see light beyond the darkness. As Mircea Eliade put it, “Life is not possible without an opening toward the transcendent.” The lynching era was the Heart of Darkness for the African American community. It was a tie when fragments of meaning were hard to find. Some found meaning in the blues and others in collective political resistance, but for many people it was religion that helped them to look beyond their tragic situation to a time when they would “cross the river of Jordan,” “lay down dat heavy load,” and “walk in Jerusalem just like John.”

The Christian gospel is God’s message of liberation in an unredeemed and tortured world. As such, it is a transcendent reality that lifts our spirits to a world far removed from the suffering of this one. It is an eschatological vision, an experience of transfiguration, such as Jesus experienced at his Baptism (Mk 1:9-11) or on Mt. Tabor (Mk 9:2-8), just before he set out on the road to Jerusalem, the road that led to Calvary.  Paul had such a vision—“a light from heaven”—as he traveled the road to Damascus (Acts 9:3). Malcolm X, while in prison, had a vision of God, and so too did Martin King hear God speaking to him in his kitchen at a moment of crisis during the Montgomery bus boycott. For all four, the revelatory moment in their lives helped to prepare them to face their deaths, sustained by the conviction that this was not the end but the beginning of a new life of meaning. To paraphrase Eliade, once contact with the transcendent is found, a new existence in the world becomes possible.

And yet the Christian gospel is more than a transcendent reality, more than “going to heaven when I die, to shout salvation as I fly.” It is also an immanent reality—a powerful liberating presence among the poor right now in their midst, “building them up where they are torn down and propping them up on every leaning side.” The gospel is found wherever poor people struggle for justice, fighting for their right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Bee Jenkins’s claim that “Jesus won’t fail you” was made in the heat of the struggle for civil rights in Mississippi, and such faith gave her strength and courage to fight for justice against overwhelming odds. Without concrete signs of divine presence in the lives of the poor, the gospel becomes simply an opiate; rather than liberating the powerless from humiliation and suffering, the gospel becomes a drug that helps them adjust to this world by looking for “pie in the sky.”

 

book cover

 

The Cross and the Lynching Tree

 

By James H. Cone

 

Orbis Books, 202 pages

 

Buy the book

And so the transcendent and the immanent, heaven and earth, must be held together in critical, dialectical tension, each one correcting the limits of the other. The gospel is in the world, but it is not of the world; that is, it can be seen in the black freedom movement, but it is much more than what we see in our struggles for justice. God’s word is paradoxical, or, as the old untutored black preacher used to say, “inscrutable,” a mystery that one can neither control nor fully understand. It is here and not here, revealed and hidden at the same time. “Truly, you are a God who hides himself, O God of Israel, the Savior” (Isa 45:15).

Nowhere is that paradox, that “inscrutability,” more evident than in the cross. A symbol of death and defeat, God turned it into a sign of liberation and new life. The cross is the most empowering symbol of God’s loving solidarity with the “least of these,” the unwanted in society who suffer daily from great injustices. Christians must face the cross as the terrible tragedy it was and discover in it, through faith and repentance, the liberating joy of eternal salvation.

But we cannot find liberating joy in the cross by spiritualizing it, by taking away its message of justice in the midst of powerlessness, suffering, and death. The cross, as a locus of divine revelation, is not good news for the powerful, for those who are comfortable with the way things are, or for anyone whose understanding of religion is aligned with power. The religious authorities of Jesus’ time were threatened by his teachings about the reign of God’s justice and love, and the state authorities executed him as an insurrectionist—one who “perverts the nation” and “stirs up the people (Lk 23:2, 5). Even Jesus’ disciples misunderstood his teachings “that the Son of Man must undergo great suffering, and be rejected,” “mocked and flogged and crucified” (Mk 8:31; Mt 20:19). They slept through his agony in the Garden (Mk 14:32), and deserted him when he was arrested, tortured, and crucified. One disciple betrayed him and another denied him, because a suffering Messiah was not the one they expected. “We had hoped that he was the one to redeem Israel” (Lk 24:21).

This reversal of expectations and conventional values is the unmistakable theme of the gospel. “What is prized by human beings is an abomination in the sigh of God” (Lk 16:15). “All who exalt themselves will be humbled, but all who humble themselves will be exalted” (Lk 18:14). This “transvaluation of values,” as Niebuhr put it, finds its apotheosis in the cross. “In Jesus’ cross God took up the existence of a slave and died the slave’s death on the tree of martyrdom” (Phil 2:8). The cross, in Martin Hengel’s words points to God’s loving solidarity with the “unspeakable suffering of those who are tortured,” and “put to death by human cruelty. … In the person and fate of the one man Jesus of Nazareth this saving solidarity of God with [the oppressed] is given its historical and physical form.” “The cross,” writes Dorothy A. Lee-Pollard, “reveals where God’s kingdom is to be found—not among the powerful or even the religious, but in the midst of powerlessness, suffering and death.” Bonhoeffer was right: “The Bible directs [us] to God’s powerlessness and suffering. Only a suffering God can help.”

Great preachers preach the cross as the heart of the Christian message. The Apostle Paul preached the cross and transformed a Jewish sect into a faith for the world. Martin Luther preached the cross and started the Protestant Reformation. Karl Barth preached the cross and created a Copernican revolution in European theology. Reinhold Niebuhr preached the cross and developed a creative perspective on Christian social ethics in America. Fannie Lou Hamer sang and preached the cross and ignited a grassroots revolution in Mississippi. Martin Luther King Jr. preached the cross and transformed the social and political life in America, pointing to an American dream of justice, for which he gave his life.

One has to have a powerful religious imagination to see redemption in the cross, to discover life in death and hope in tragedy. What kind of salvation is that? No human language can fully describe what salvation through the cross means. Salvation through the cross is a mystery and can only be apprehended through faith, repentance, and humility. The cross is an “opening to the transcendent” for the poor who have nowhere else to turn—that transcendence of the spirit that no one can take away, no matter what they do. Salvation is broken spirits being healed, voiceless people speaking out, and black people empowered to love their own blackness.

And yet another type of imagination is necessary—the imagination to relate the message of the cross to one’s own social reality, to see that “They are crucifying again the Son of God” (Heb 6:6). Both Jesus and blacks were “strange fruit.” Theologically speaking, Jesus was the “first lynchee,” who foreshadowed all the lynched black bodies on American soil. He was crucified by the same principalities and powers that lynched black people in America. Because God was present with Jesus on the cross and thereby refused to let Satan and death have the last word about his meaning, God was also present at every lynching in the United States. God saw what whites did to innocent and helpless blacks and claimed their suffering as God’s own. God transformed lynched black bodies into the recrucified body of Christ. Every time a white mob lynched a black person, they lynched Jesus. The lynching tree is the cross in America. When American Christians realize that they can meet Jesus only in the crucified bodies in our midst, they will encounter the real scandal of the cross.

Excerpted from “The Cross and the Lynching Tree” by James H. Cone. Published by Orbis Books, 2011.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By stevendeedon, December 28, 2011 at 10:28 am Link to this comment

One brief coda.  Take a look at the excerpt from James
H. Cone’s book, under the heading “God of the
Oppressed,” here on Truthdig.  While I don’t quite go
for the WAY he draws a parallel with Jesus’
crucifixion, there certainly IS a parallel.  And had I
read this I could have left much of my explaining to
the very eloquent passage from James H. Cone’s book.  I
heartily recommend reading it.

Report this

By Cliff Carson, December 24, 2011 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment

Keep in mind that many of the Televangelist expound the concept that “God wants us to prosper - financially.”

That message does not line up with this article does it?  Seems the message here is to accept the abuse heaped on you by the, -non-religious?, in full knowledge that your day will come in that heavenly meeting in the air.  Agree or disagree?

If we are to accept the abuse from the Religious - did I say that right?, what is the difference between the Religious poor and the Religious Rich and Powerful?

Seems to me the subtle message of this article is the poor have an excuse to be poor.  Something tells me that the Religious Rich and Powerful surely do like to hear that.

I believe that may be a comfort to many people but it was some time ago that Anarcissie led me to read “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”.

I recommend that everyone read that.  Then come back and read this article again plus White’s review of “The Cross and the Lynching Tree”, another Tread on Truthdig.

Then tell me whether or not these reviews try to make Religion a Racial or Financial thing.

That is exactly what is occurring today, Religion has been usurped by the Rich and Powerful and those who preach Racially Exclusivity, to utilize as a weapon against the “not Worthy”.

Report this

By Edeva Sin, December 22, 2011 at 12:29 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The idea that we should accept suffering and struggle in life and await our rewards in death seems more than a little creepy. I still find it hard to believe such drivle is thought of as ‘comforting’. What comfort is gained from believing there is a reason you are watching your family starve? Can you eat the cross?
What I find most distasteful is the idea that we peasants must accept our ‘place’ and wait until we die to be rewarded by a loving father who, if we fail him in any way, will reward us with eternal suffering. Religion may use the word love to get your attention but fear is the opperative word for their true function.

Report this

By Terrell, December 22, 2011 at 9:51 am Link to this comment

Headed over to Amazon to buy the book, God of the Oppressed, but, alas, no Kindle version - and with my myopic eyes, no Kindle version means the took doesn’t exist.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 22, 2011 at 8:22 am Link to this comment

From my point of view, there seems to be some defect or incompleteness in the Christian message, in that about 70% of the vigorously Christ-professing Evangelical voting population voted for George W. Bush in 2004.  By then he was known to be a liar as well as a warmonger (that is, a murderer of the innocent).  ‘Their blood be upon us and upon our children,’ they might well have said.

The ‘we have all fallen short of the glory of God’ excuse doesn’t seem to cut it in this case.  It seems to me you can fall well short of the glory of God without slaughtering, maiming, torturing, terrorizing, humiliating, imprisoning and impoverishing the innocent.

Report this

By MarcoVincenzo, December 22, 2011 at 6:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“but for many people it was religion that helped them to look beyond their tragic situation”

Stockholm syndrome sure comes in many forms. The “tragic situation” was the direct result of others adhering to the tenets of the Christian religion.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, December 22, 2011 at 2:29 am Link to this comment

When I see an image of a lynching, I see a crime.

When I see a person going hungry, I see a crime.

When I see a “rich” man, I see a crime.

When I look in the mirror, I see a criminal.

Report this

By gerard, December 21, 2011 at 2:34 pm Link to this comment

My prejudices may have led me to read this article wrong, but—it seems to me to be a more-than-slightly overwrought rendering of the necessity for unnecessary suffering—and thereby a twisted plea for the tolerance of pain inflicted upon the innocent by those who have full power either to inflict it, or to permit it, or to put a stop to the causes of it.(Is the suffering of the poor at the hands of the rich, meritorious?)
  I do not believe that any prophet or priest had or has the wisdom or the right to decree that suffering is both inevitable and essentially transformative. Whatever has been accomplished in history has been accomplished in spite of suffering, by triumphing over it to reach a “higher consciousness”, a “saving grace”—the tranquility of spirit that enables “angels” to learn how to dance on the head of a pin.  It is a kind of human magic, available to all, but more than likely avoided and overlooked by our inability to imagine creative solutions to human problems.
  This does not mean that suffering is without merit and honor; only that other solutions (or denouments)  might have been equally possible and meritorious and far more humane.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.