Regulatory Outcome of British Press Inquiry Uncertain (Video)
At the end of a yearlong investigation into the conduct of British newspapers, the lead inspector fell short of calling for the establishment of a body to police the media industry. Instead, an “independent” entity should be directed to overhaul the organization by which the press regulates itself, he said.
At the end of a yearlong investigation into the conduct of British newspapers, the lead inspector fell short of calling for the establishment of a body to police the media industry. Instead, an “independent” entity should be directed to overhaul the organization by which the press regulates itself, he said.
According to a report by The Guardian, Lord Justice Leveson recommended that a government-approved organization such as Ofcom, which has some authority to promote competition between publishers and broadcasters, be appointed to oversee the reformation of the Press Complaints Commission, which will be relied upon to regulate the press. The PCC is currently a voluntary regulatory body with no legal powers and is fully funded by its member newspapers and magazines, meaning the industry polices itself.
With the exception of giving some legal power to the group that monitors the PCC, Leveson is uninterested in regulating the press outright. “The legislation would not establish a body to regulate the press: it would be up to the press to come forward with their own body that meets the criteria laid down,” he wrote in the report’s executive summary. An oversight body such as Ofcom would be legally empowered to step in if the PCC fails to do its job.
Whether the criteria Leveson hints at are strong enough to produce regulation that prevents wrongdoing, such as the phone hacking that prompted the investigation, will depend on how lawmakers decide to reform the PCC and what legal powers they grant the organization that oversees it.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
The Guardian:
In the 56-page summary to his wide-ranging 2,000-page report, Leveson says the purpose of legislation is “not to establish a body to regulate the press”. But he warns that if newspapers are not prepared to join a revamped PCC it will be necessary to force Ofcom to act as a “backstop regulator”.
Leveson says it is necessary for a body like Ofcom to monitor a revamped PCC to “reassure the public of its independence” – but insists that legislation would “not establish a body to regulate the press, that is for the press to do”.
The Guardian:
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Rebekah Brooks is officially off the hook. For those who might not know, or might have lost track of this story in the whirl of the spin cycle, Brooks is the former editor of Rupert Murdoch's now-defunct News of the World tabloid in the United Kingdom.
England's Central Criminal Court has learned that the Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper -- which closed after revelations of a phone hacking scandal -- kept a "legendary safe" where "all sorts of stories [about rich and famous people] were buried."
A secret audio recording reveals News Corp Executive Chairman Rupert Murdoch criticizing the investigation into allegations of phone hacking by former journalists for his now-defunct News of the World paper, the BBC reports.
Will Hutton, writing in The Observer, says the "precious freedom of speech of an individual is different from the freedom of speech of a media corporation with its capacity to manipulate the opinions of millions."
“Allowing media power to be concentrated in the hands of a few multibillionaires will impoverish society,” says Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, who offers a seven-question test for whether a media organization is a potential menace to the public.
The declaration by British MPs on Tuesday that Rupert Murdoch exercised "willfull blindness" about phone hacking at The News of the World and is "not a fit person" to run a major international company has prompted the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to ask the FCC to revoke the 27 Fox broadcast licenses that News Corp. holds in the U.S.