USDA May Let Monsanto Test Own Crops
Monsanto, a giant in the genetically modified food business, may be granted a privilege that any corporation would envy: regulating its own products.
Monsanto, a giant in the genetically modified food business, may be granted a privilege that any corporation would envy: regulating its own products.
The USDA’s National Environmental Policy Act Pilot Project will allow Monsanto and other biotech companies to run their own environmental impact studies, effectively trusting the companies to police themselves.
The plan is particularly controversial because Monsanto has a long history of manufacturing toxic chemicals (like Agent Orange and Roundup) and genetically modified crops with potentially dangerous effects. It’s also the producer of bovine growth hormone (rBGH), which is banned in Europe and Canada. Monsanto’s business practices have been called into question by an array of watchdogs and nonprofit organizations. –KDG
Your support is crucial...Fast Company:
Because the USDA is so bad at doing its job on time, the agency decided to see if anyone else was prepared to do its EIS work instead. And so it looks like the USDA will at least temporarily hand over environmental impact responsibilities to the biotech companies behind GMO crops. The pilot program will allow these companies to conduct their own environmental assessments of crops or outsource the work to contractors.
The USDA won’t actually admit that it’s bad at performing its duties–instead, the agency claims that the move will make the environmental reporting process more timely, efficient, and cost-effective, according to the Federal Register. No knock on Monsanto, which is surely made up of great, honest people, but if the company has a vested interest in getting one of its crops deregulated, why wouldn’t it try to fudge the numbers on an environmental review? And why wouldn’t its hired contractors do the same? If this wasn’t so dangerous, it would be funny.
As we navigate an uncertain 2025, with a new administration questioning press freedoms, the risks are clear: our ability to report freely is under threat.
Your tax-deductible donation enables us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes the reality beneath the headlines — without compromise.
Now is the time to take action. Stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and uncover the stories that need to be told.
Military
While the U.S. military used the herbicide to defoliate the jungles of Southeast Asia, it sprayed the same chemicals to kill poison oak and other weeds in northern California.
Vietnam vets and widows are pushing to extend benefits to those stricken with glioblastoma after exposure.
Chris Hedges: Vietnam War, Like the Later Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, Was ‘One Long Atrocity’ (Video)
What if casualties don’t end on the battlefield but extend to future generations? Our reporting this year suggests the government may not want to know the answer.
Phil Cacioppo challenged the government’s findings on the chemical used extensively during the Vietnam War after the Veterans Administration rejected his claim for benefits. Six years later, the former Air Force radio repairman emerged the rare victor.
Neither the Navy nor the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has a comprehensive list of which ships went where during the Vietnam War. As a result, veterans themselves often have to prove their ships served in areas where Agent Orange was sprayed.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.