U.N. Experts to United States: Stop the Dakota Access Pipeline NowStanding Rock Sioux were "denied access to information and excluded from consultations," a United Nations special rapporteur charges.
By Andrea Germanos / Common Dreams
Backing up the Standing Rock Sioux and its allies, a United Nations expert has called on the United States to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline.
Echoing pipeline opponents’ concerns, the statement from the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, cited the pipeline’s threats to drinking water and sacred sites. She also admonished the U.S. for failing to protect protesters’ rights and failing to properly consult with communities affected by the fossil fuel infrastructure.
“The tribe was denied access to information and excluded from consultations at the planning stage of the project, and environmental assessments failed to disclose the presence and proximity of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation,” Tauli-Corpuz stated Thursday—just two days after Standing Rock Chairman Dave Archambault II urged the UN Human Rights Council to help the tribe stop the pipeline.
Informed consent from those affected—and abiding by the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples—is essential, she said, “particularly in connection with extractive resource industries.”
Responding to the crackdown on pipeline protesters, she said, “The U.S. authorities should fully protect and facilitate the right to freedom of peaceful assembly of indigenous peoples, which plays a key role in empowering their ability to claim other rights.”
According to Tom Goldtooth, the director of the Indigenous Environmental Network, “The UN Expert got it right.”
“What the U.S. calls consultation is not consultation but a statement telling people what they’re doing after millions of dollars have been invested, painting Indigenous Peoples as spoilers. The right of free, prior, and informed consent begins prior to the planning process, not when their bulldozers are at your doorstep.”
Tauli-Corpuz’s statement was endorsed by seven other U.N. experts, including Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation, Léo Heller; Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, John H. Knox; and Special Rapporteur on cultural rights, Karima Bennoune.
The pipeline, slated to snake a 1,172-mile path across four states from the Bakken fields of North Dakota to a hub in Illinois, has faced months of building resistance.
Given the continued protests—and legal hurdles—”the way forward won’t be simple” for the pipeline company, the Bismarck Tribune reports this weekend.
And if it is ultimately halted, that’d be good news for pipeline opponents and proponents alike, according to Jacob Johns, a Spokane, Wash. resident and member of the An akimel O’Othm (Gila River Pima) and Hopi tribes.
“We’re out there protesting on behalf of the people who were for the pipeline,” he said to KXLY. “They don’t realize we’re out there fighting for each other, we are humanity trying to heal itself and save itself.”Wait, before you go…
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.Support Truthdig
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.