Two Black Americas
WASHINGTON — Forty years after the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was killed, we sometimes talk about race in America as if nothing had changed. The truth is that everything has changed — mostly for the better — and that if we’re ever going to see King’s dream fulfilled, first we have to acknowledge that this is not an America he would have recognized.
On April 4, 1968, it was possible to make the generalization that being black in this country meant being poor; fully 40 percent of black Americans lived below the poverty line, according to census data, with an additional 20 percent barely keeping their heads above water. African-Americans were heavily concentrated in the inner cities and the rural South. We were far less likely than whites to go to college, and our presence in the corporate world was minimal.
Today about 25 percent of African-Americans are mired in poverty. In many ways, being black and poor is a more desperate and hopeless condition now than it was 40 years ago. For those who managed to enter the middle class, however, most of the old generalizations no longer apply.
There remains a significant income gap between whites and blacks in this country, although it shrinks when educational level is factored in. But the gap in wealth, or net worth, is huge, even when you control for education, age, family size and whatever else you want to throw in. Still, African-Americans control an estimated $800 billion in purchasing power. If that were translated into gross domestic product, a sovereign “Black America” would be the 15th or 16th richest nation on Earth.
Forty years ago, not even 2 percent of black households earned the equivalent of $100,000 a year in today’s dollars. Now, about 10 percent of black households have crossed that threshold. George and Louise Jefferson aren’t so lonely anymore in that “deluxe apartment in the sky.”
Then again, if “The Jeffersons” was being produced today, George and Louise probably wouldn’t live in an apartment at all. More realistically, they’d be on a cul-de-sac in a suburban community. In Washington and a growing number of cities, more African-Americans now live in the suburbs than within the city limits.
In a sense, then, the most striking measure of how far African-Americans have come since 1968 isn’t the rise of Barack Obama. It’s the story of Stanley O’Neal.
That’s not to minimize the prospect that a nation midwifed by slavery could soon have its first black president. But O’Neal did something that would have been equally unimaginable 40 years ago. He rose to become chief executive of Merrill Lynch, one of Wall Street’s biggest firms; by all accounts, he was a taskmaster of a boss who cared less about whether subordinates liked him than about the bottom line. He placed big bets on mortgage-backed securities, generating record profits for the firm. When he got caught in the mortgage crisis several months ago and was forced to write off billions in losses, he resigned — and floated back to earth with the help of one of the loveliest golden parachutes Wall Street has seen.
Oh, and his grandfather was born a slave.
Lacking family wealth accumulated by prior generations, middle-class black Americans are right to worry that their economic success is more precarious than that of many whites. But no one can deny that most African-Americans today have opportunities that weren’t remotely possible 40 years ago.
For those who haven’t made it into the middle class, however, things are different. Inner-city communities were hollowed out — a process accelerated by the riots that followed King’s death — and then left fallow for decades. Middle-class professionals fled, businesses closed, schools disintegrated, family structure fell apart. Drugs and crime were symptoms of the general rot; the gentrification of recent years has just shifted the pathology from one part of the city to another, or perhaps to a close-in suburb — swept into a corner.
The African-American poor are a smaller segment than they were 40 years ago, but arguably they are further from full participation in society than they were in King’s era. It’s not that they have no interest in climbing the ladder, it’s that too many rungs are missing.
It’s misleading, then, to make any general statement about the condition of black Americans without recognizing black America’s diversity. Economically speaking, there is one group of black Americans that has achieved success and one that hasn’t — and the distance between those groups is growing. To make more progress toward Martin Luther King’s dream, we have to take an honest assessment of how far we’ve come — and honestly account for who’s been left behind.
Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com. © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group’TIS THE REASON…
You know the story. Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media. During this holiday season, you can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearth what's really happening- without compromise. Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
As always, we wish you truth, reason and the best of the season!