How Trump Is Losing in Syria and Why Nikki Haley Is PosturingWhile it isn’t clear whether the president has a policy in Syria, the Department of Defense is failing to achieve its goals and the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. is issuing empty threats.
Well, I say Trump is losing, but it isn’t clear that Trump has a policy in Syria or cares whether he wins. The Department of Defense is losing. Its policy has been to:
1. Defeat ISIL with the help of the leftist Kurds of the YPG (People’s Protection Units)
2. Weaken Assad in hopes of his overthrow by covertly supporting fundamentalist guerrillas
3. Once it became clear those guerrillas could not take Damascus, the US supported the “deconfliction zones” also suggested by Russia as a way of preserving the rebel areas from complete defeat and putting down a marker on negotiations toward a post-war Syria that made a place for the rebels (as opposed to a return to complete one-party Baath rule).
4. Find ways to block Iranian influence in Syria and to stop Iran’s use of Iraq and Syria as land bridges to supply Hizbullah. (This goal was not really that of the US but of Israel, with which the US is helping.)
5. Retain strong relationships with Syria’s neighbors–Turkey, Israel, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon.
While the plan to defeat ISIL with the help of the Kurds worked, it is being interrupted in its last stages by the Turkish invasion of Afrin, one of three Kurdish enclaves in northern Syria and the only one where US troops were not embedded.
YPG militiamen have deserted the front lines with the last ISIL holdouts to run off to Afrin to help defend it against the Turkish incursion, which is being aided by Arab fundamentalist militias of the “Free Syrian Army.” There are fears that ISIL will stage a comeback if this pressure is removed.
Moreover, the last thing the YPG is interested in at the moment is blocking Iran. It is contemplating an alliance with Assad against Turkey.
Worse, Turkey has disregarded US entreaties to cease its move against the Syrian Kurds. Turkish officials are on the cusp of taking Afrin, and they plan to move east to Manbij and Kobane after that. There are US troops embedded with Kurdish forces in those areas, so a US-Turkish war looms if the Turks follow through and the US stands its ground.
The US is having vastly to curtail its use of the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey, having sent A-10 tank-killing planes to Afghanistan and having sent US dependents home. These moves signal a severe rift in NATO.
The US hopes of avoiding a complete defeat of the fundamentalist Arab rebels through the de-confliction zones and then negotiations with al-Assad from a position of relative strength are also fading, as al-Assad and Russia have used the past year of reduced conflict to prepare for a final military push. The Syrian Arab Army is now splitting the East Ghouta enclave near Damascus into three, which will allow it to cut off aid to them and to negotiate with each of the neighborhoods in turn and to separate off the militias that dominate each one.
The possibility of the fall of East Ghouta this year impelled US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley to issue a threat of US bombing if chemical weapons were used by the regime. It was an empty piece of bluster, since the East Ghouta operation is a Russian one in the air, and the US will not intervene in a Russian sphere of influence.
The Syrian Arab Army has also taken substantial territory up at Idlib in the north.
And Syrian and Russian fighter jets have begun bombing the southern rebels around Deraa after the latter announced that they would begin an operation against the regime (presumably to relieve East Ghouta).
US strategic goals, with the exception of the defeat of ISIL, are being negated one after another, and whether ISIL in Syria can be permanently rolled up is now in doubt.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.Support Truthdig
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.