| TD originals

Travel Ban Waivers Rarely Granted, Advocates Say

Opponents of President Trump's travel ban protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments about the order in April. (Andrew Harnik / AP)

President Trump’s third version of a ban on travelers from eight countries remains in effect as legal challenges wind their way through the courts. One of the legal defenses for allowing it to stay in place was the option for citizens of those countries to apply for individual waivers, exceptions that would allow them into the United States. According to multiple reports, including from Reuters in March, and now The Washington Post, these waivers are nearly impossible to obtain.

“The ban,” a Reuters report explains, “contains a provision that those who do not qualify for exceptions can be considered for waivers in special circumstances, such as a need for urgent medical care or to accommodate adoptions.”

In the first month of the ban, Reuters reported, over 8,400 people from the eight countries—Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Somalia, Yemen and Venezuela—had applied for visas. As of mid-February, only two people had been granted waivers.

Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen and Republican Sen. Jeff Flake both requested information from the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security in January, noting that they “received reports of the near uniform denial of waivers for visas.”

More than two months later, “The State Department says it has granted hundreds of waivers, but declined to say who received them and how,” according to an article Tuesday in The Washington Post.

The government says 655 people from the eight countries have been granted waivers, but as the Post notes, advocates believe that the number actually allowed into the U.S. is much lower. Even the State Department “acknowledged that a ‘cleared’ or ‘granted’ waiver does not mean the applicant actually has received a visa,” The Post reports. “A State Department official said many waiver recipients have received actual visas, but declined to give specifics.”

Lawyers for those seeking waivers have called it “window dressing” and “a sham.”

The Washington Post reached out to over 30 immigration attorneys and advocacy groups asking if they knew of anyone who had successfully obtained a waiver. The search turned up only 25 from the five Muslim-majority countries included in the ban.

For those seeking to be reunited with family, to escape war or to receive lifesaving medical treatment, the outlook is not promising. Many legal analysts expect the conservative-leaning Supreme Court to rule in favor of the ban in June.

Truthdig is running a reader-funded project to document the Poor People’s Campaign. Please help us by making a donation.

Ilana Novick
Blogger / Editorial Assistant

Now you can personalize your Truthdig experience. To bookmark your favorite articles, please create a user profile.

Personalize your Truthdig experience. Choose authors to follow, bookmark your favorite articles and more.
Your Truthdig, your way. Access your favorite authors, articles and more.

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles and comments are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.