Supreme Court: Class Action Lawsuits Are a Privilege, Not a Right
There is a takeaway message from this latest devastating ruling by the Supreme Court, which says there is nothing wrong with giving corporations the power to prevent cheated consumers from banding together to mount class action lawsuits, and it is this (more).
There is a takeaway message from this latest devastating ruling by the Supreme Court, which says there is nothing wrong with giving corporations the power to prevent cheated consumers from banding together to mount class action lawsuits, and it is this: Corporate interests are on a slash-and-burn campaign against any sort of collective action on the part of the American people. –YL
Dig, Root, GrowLos Angeles Times:
The Supreme Court gave corporations a major win Wednesday, ruling in a 5-4 decision that companies can block their disgruntled customers from joining together in a class-action lawsuit. The ruling arose from a California lawsuit involving cellphones, but it will have a nationwide impact.
In the past, consumers who bought a product or a service had been free to join a class-action lawsuit if they were dissatisfied or felt they had been cheated. By combining these small claims, they could bring a major lawsuit against a corporation.
But in Wednesday’s decision, the high court said that under the Federal Arbitration Act companies can force these disgruntled customers to arbitrate their complaints individually, not as part of a group. Consumer-rights advocates said this rule would spell the end for small claims involving products or services.
This year, we’re all on shaky ground, and the need for independent journalism has never been greater. A new administration is openly attacking free press — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.
Your support is more than a donation. It helps us dig deeper into hidden truths, root out corruption and misinformation, and grow an informed, resilient community.
Independent journalism like Truthdig doesn't just report the news — it helps cultivate a better future.
Your tax-deductible gift powers fearless reporting and uncompromising analysis. Together, we can protect democracy and expose the stories that must be told.
This spring, stand with our journalists.
Dig. Root. Grow. Cultivate a better future.
Donate today.
Courts & Law
A little-noticed 9-0 decision points ominously toward a post-parody culture.
TD Original
Meet the scholars-for-hire who preach solidarity in service of a software company with a long and sordid record of collaboration.
Politics
ESG is called “woke capitalism” by the right and “greenwashing” by the left. But to most investors, it’s just common sense.
Economic Justice
The move would disrupt the influence of UNOS, the contractor whose control of organ sharing has been nearly all-encompassing for decades.
Technology
A flood of new satellites could lead to the destruction of the ozone layer.
Economic Justice
Twenty of the world’s biggest food corporations paid $53.5 billion to their shareholders over the past two years.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.