Poll Shows Almost 20 Percent of Trump Supporters Disapprove of Lincoln Freeing the Slaves
Just when it seemed as if things couldn't get any worse.
Matt Johnson / CC BY 2.0
Just when it seemed as if the bar couldn’t go any lower, a new poll has found that nearly one in five supporters of Donald Trump don’t approve of the freeing of slaves in the Confederacy.
The orange-skinned GOP presidential front-runner has been likened to the late segregationist Alabama Gov. George Wallace for running a political campaign based in large part on bigotry and intolerance. The results of the YouGov/Economist survey offer a terrifying insight into his voter base.
The January poll asked respondents if they approved or disapproved of “the executive order that freed all slaves in the states that were in rebellion against the federal government.”
From Vox:
That executive order is better known as the Emancipation Proclamation. Thirteen percent of respondents—and “nearly 20 percent of Trump supporters,” the Times reports, compared with 5 percent of Marco Rubio’s—said they disapproved of it.
It gets even worse. An additional 17 percent of respondents said they weren’t sure.
Before asking about slavery, YouGov first asked two broader poll questions about executive orders: Do you approve of them, and do you think they’re constitutional? Then pollsters asked about specific presidential actions, including freeing the slaves, desegregating the military, interning Japanese Americans during World War II and deferring deportation for some unauthorized immigrants.
Framing the question this way is a reminder that one of Lincoln’s greatest acts, and a turning point in American history, was also a controversial exercise of presidential power. And it’s stunning how many people can’t bring themselves to say they approve of it.
Read more here.
—Posted by Roisin Davis
WAIT, BEFORE YOU GO…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
TD Column
Why does the LAist think Angelenos care what Nury Martinez has to say?
Reading about America a century ago offers an eerie sense of decades melting away and past and present blurring together.
Campaigns in New Jersey and Virginia that used immigration and other issues to promote racism lost. The next big test is the race for Jeff Sessions' vacant Senate seat.
Whether or not the new travel ban stands up in the courts, it is a piece of sordid bigotry.
Too often during this election season, a discourse of "bad manners" has paraded as insight while working to conceal the effects of power, politics, racial injustice and other forms of oppression.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.