No Warrant Necessary for Cell Phone Searches in California
The California Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that police officers in the Golden State don't need a warrant to be able to peruse the cell phones of those under arrest -- a decision that may have troubling implications and may eventually involve the U.S. Supreme Court.
The California Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that police officers in the Golden State don’t need a warrant to be able to peruse the cell phones of those under arrest — a decision that may have troubling implications and may eventually involve the U.S. Supreme Court. –KA
Your support matters…AP via CBS News:
California Deputy Attorney General Victoria Wilson, who represented the prosecution in the case decided Monday, told the newspaper the split opinions in California and Ohio could lead the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on the cell phone issue.
The California Supreme Court decided the loss of privacy upon arrest extends beyond the arrestee’s body to include personal property.
Authorities can not only seize items but also can open and examine what they find, the ruling said.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
King Salman's brother and nephew reportedly do not support Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has consolidated power in the kingdom.
Police corner trapped demonstrators that had fortified university but now seek escape. Supporters try to disrupt law enforcement outside.
The river cruise ship collided with a much smaller sightseeing boat on the Danube River, leaving seven dead and 21 still missing.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.