Justice Scalia Gets Most of His News From Talk Radio
The man who was once the Supreme Court's most conservative justice (now there's a depressing past tense) tells New York magazine that he gets most of his news listening to talk radio on the way to and from work.
The man who was once the Supreme Court’s most conservative justice (now there’s a depressing past tense) tells New York magazine that he gets most of his news listening to talk radio on the way to and from work.
Last year a study showed that people who get their news from talk radio are less informed than those who get their news exclusively from “The Daily Show.”
Here’s the exchange from the interview:
What’s your media diet? Where do you get your news? Well, we get newspapers in the morning.
“We” meaning the justices? No! Maureen and I.
Oh, you and your wife … I usually skim them. We just get The Wall Street Journal and the Washington Times. We used to get the Washington Post, but it just … went too far for me. I couldn’t handle it anymore.
What tipped you over the edge? It was the treatment of almost any conservative issue. It was slanted and often nasty. And, you know, why should I get upset every morning? I don’t think I’m the only one. I think they lost subscriptions partly because they became so shrilly, shrilly liberal.
So no New York Times, either? No New York Times, no Post.
And do you look at anything online? I get most of my news, probably, driving back and forth to work, on the radio.
Not NPR? Sometimes NPR. But not usually.
Talk guys? Talk guys, usually.
Do you have a favorite? You know who my favorite is? My good friend Bill Bennett. He’s off the air by the time I’m driving in, but I listen to him sometimes when I’m shaving. He has a wonderful talk show. It’s very thoughtful. He has good callers. I think they keep off stupid people.
As Brad Friedman recalls, Antonin Scalia’s “good friend Bill Bennett” said in 2005, “you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down.” That’s where a Supreme Court justice gets his knowledge about the world. Read more of Friedman’s breakdown from the New York interview here.
— Posted by Peter Z. Scheer
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
Courts & Law
If you want to deepen your understanding of the differences between “originalism” and “living constitutionalism” as competing theories of constitutional law and interpretation, there’s no better place to begin than with the 2006 debate between the late conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the recently retired liberal Justice Stephen Breyer.
A new Second Amendment appeal could radically expand the scope of District of Columbia v. Heller, handicapping Congress for years to come.
The implications of Justice Thomas’ tenure on the nation’s top court extend far beyond his own career and legacy.
And with Neil Gorsuch and now Brett Kavanaugh in tow, the president is well on his way achieving his objective.
The confirmation of President Trump's nominee would mark the culmination of a right-wing legal counterrevolution that has been decades in the making.
The president has chosen a candidate who poses a great threat to progressive values and causes—and one who might shield him from Mueller.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.