A Letter to Progressives in Congress: Break Your Silence on Ukraine
As Ukrainian people continue to suffer, there have been disturbing reports that the U.S. and its allies have actually obstructed diplomatic initiatives.It’s long past time that you spoke up for genuine diplomacy to bring an end to the horrible war and human suffering in Ukraine. Russia’s invasion was criminal. Now, the war is stalemated and neither side can “win.” As many analysts including Noam Chomsky and Gen. Mark Milley have said, the war will end only through a negotiated peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine.
When the Congressional Progressive Caucus launched in 1991, a major goal was the shifting of federal resources from the Pentagon and military contractors to programs of social uplift and social justice. Yet today, it seems that some CPC members are fighting harder for weapons to Ukraine than for healthcare to Americans.
It’s time for you to break your enabling silence over the Ukraine War, as Martin Luther King Jr. bravely did in 1967 when a Democratic president was invoking “defense of democracy” as a rationale for sending ever more weapons and troops into the stalemated Vietnam War. King referred to war spending as “a demonic, destructive suction tube” that siphoned resources away from crucial anti-poverty programs. In the mid-1960s, some Democrats in Congress spoke out on the war against a president of their own party; they demanded answers, an accounting of costs, and a negotiated end to the war. We look back at them—including Senators Wayne Morse, Eugene McCarthy, and Robert Kennedy—as Democratic heroes of that era.
Today, progressives in Congress have been far from heroic—as you’ve failed to demand answers of a Democratic White House that seems to have no plan beyond shipping more weaponry to Ukraine. A year ago, it was worse than embarrassing to see you sheepishly withdraw a moderately worded letter to the president that sensibly called for “a proactive diplomatic push” toward a negotiated settlement.
Many of your constituents are sickened to see right-wing Republicans in Congress filling the vacuum created by your silence, demanding Ukraine War accountability through their “ Define The Mission Act.” If you don’t want to support their legislation, why haven’t you introduced your own bill toward Ukraine accountability? With regards to a war that heightens the risk of nuclear war, what action have you taken since the ill-advised withdrawal of the push-for-diplomacy letter a year ago?
As Ukrainian people continue to suffer, there have been disturbing reports that the U.S. and its allies have actually obstructed diplomatic initiatives. So far, Congress has approved well over $100 billion in Ukraine War-related spending since Russia’s invasion, mostly military aid—with $76.8 billion directly to Ukraine. And the White House is now seeking more weapons funding, with no objection—and much encouragement—from progressives in Congress.
Unlike “America-First” isolationists, progressives are internationalists. We care about the Ukrainian people; we support substantial humanitarian aid to Ukraine now and for reconstruction in the future. We are appalled by supporters of President Joe Biden’s Ukraine policy who downplay Ukrainian hardship as they hail prolonged war as a victory for U.S. geopolitical interests.
Progressives in Congress should be carrying on the legacy of Martin Luther King, Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, and many others to shift the federal government’s focus from militarism—now costing nearly $1 trillion per year, with 750 overseas military bases—to social justice at home. It’s about time you broke ranks from the lockstep of open-ended war:
- Start asking questions about the Biden administration’s Ukraine policy, including how billions of tax dollars for weapons of war could instead be spent on pressing domestic needs.
- If you don’t want to support a Republican-initiated bill seeking accountability on the Ukraine War, introduce your own.
- Demand wide-ranging congressional hearings on Ukraine that include progressive experts who’ve criticized U.S. failures to work toward a ceasefire and negotiations to end the war.
- Insist that the Biden administration engages in genuine diplomacy to end the horrors of war in Ukraine.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
"Now, the war is stalemated and neither side can “win.” "
That is complete, total nonsense.
Wars of attrition are not about territorial gain. They are about the destruction of the enemy's capability to wage war. This generally means the annihilation of the opposing army. In this respect, the Russians are not stalemated: they are winning - and the longer the war continues, the more they win.
THIS is why the West is in a...
"Now, the war is stalemated and neither side can “win.” "
That is complete, total nonsense.
Wars of attrition are not about territorial gain. They are about the destruction of the enemy's capability to wage war. This generally means the annihilation of the opposing army. In this respect, the Russians are not stalemated: they are winning - and the longer the war continues, the more they win.
THIS is why the West is in a panic, why Zalusnyi is fouling his pants, and why Zelensky has retreated into a coke-addled delirium of denial.
The only question is whether Russia will accept the poison-coated US offer of peace which is made on the brazenly deceptive premise of 'continuing stalemate'. I suspect not. The Russians are going to rub the neocons' noses in the poo they did on Russia's doorstep. And the world will applaud.