Crypto.Cat: The Chat Site That Protects Your Privacy
Lebanese expatriate Nadim Kobeissi, 21, is determined to “subvert governments and frustrate marketers” with a cat- and code-themed website that allows users to exchange messages and files that can’t be read by anyone but the sender and receiver.
Lebanese expatriate Nadim Kobeissi, 21, is determined to “subvert governments and frustrate marketers” with a cat- and code-themed website that allows users to exchange messages and files that can’t be read by anyone but the sender and receiver.
Kobeissi — who endured the loss of loved ones, barely escaped death himself, and knows people who were tortured because they did not protect their online communications — hopes crypto.cat will provide journalists, dissidents and others under surveillance with a secure alternative to such messaging applications as those available on Gmail, Facebook and Skype.
With an interface that will be familiar to those who grew up in the decades of 8-bit gaming, Kobeissi also hopes to make his chat client something people will want to use rather than simply need. But he also warns that the program is still in development and should not yet be regarded as completely secure.
Watch a fun introduction to crypto.cat made by Kobeissi below.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Wired’s Threat Level:
Cryptocat is an encrypted web-based chat. It’s the first chat client in the browser to allow anyone to use end-to-end encryption to communicate without the problems of SSL, the standard way browsers do crypto, or mucking about with downloading and installing other software. For Kobeissi, that means non-technical people anywhere in the world can talk without fear of online snooping from corporations, criminals or governments.
“The fact that you don’t have to install anything, the fact that it works instantly, this increases security,” he explained, sitting down with Wired at HOPE 9 to talk about Cryptocat, activism and getting through American airports.
Cryptocat Adventure! from Nadim Kobeissi on Vimeo.
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
The reality of the Cambridge Analytica/Facebook scandal is far more sinister than a loss of personal privacy.
And this time there's "much less public scrutiny," writes Trevor Timm at The Guardian.
The bill, which would have penalized companies that refuse to cooperate with the government over encrypted phones, did not go to a vote.
The controversy over encryption has been one of the biggest public debates of the year so far, yet the Democratic presidential candidates have been largely silent on the subject.
WhatsApp, an online messaging service owned by Facebook, has over a billion users -- and as of Tuesday, any exchanges done via the app will be encrypted.
Although the year-long, concerted effort of hundreds of journalists is an admirable feat, their analysis may be overlooking crucial evidence involving corruption by Western corporations and billionaires.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.