Crypto.Cat: The Chat Site That Protects Your Privacy
Lebanese expatriate Nadim Kobeissi, 21, is determined to “subvert governments and frustrate marketers” with a cat- and code-themed website that allows users to exchange messages and files that can’t be read by anyone but the sender and receiver.
Lebanese expatriate Nadim Kobeissi, 21, is determined to “subvert governments and frustrate marketers” with a cat- and code-themed website that allows users to exchange messages and files that can’t be read by anyone but the sender and receiver.
Kobeissi — who endured the loss of loved ones, barely escaped death himself, and knows people who were tortured because they did not protect their online communications — hopes crypto.cat will provide journalists, dissidents and others under surveillance with a secure alternative to such messaging applications as those available on Gmail, Facebook and Skype.
With an interface that will be familiar to those who grew up in the decades of 8-bit gaming, Kobeissi also hopes to make his chat client something people will want to use rather than simply need. But he also warns that the program is still in development and should not yet be regarded as completely secure.
Watch a fun introduction to crypto.cat made by Kobeissi below.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Wired’s Threat Level:
Cryptocat is an encrypted web-based chat. It’s the first chat client in the browser to allow anyone to use end-to-end encryption to communicate without the problems of SSL, the standard way browsers do crypto, or mucking about with downloading and installing other software. For Kobeissi, that means non-technical people anywhere in the world can talk without fear of online snooping from corporations, criminals or governments.
“The fact that you don’t have to install anything, the fact that it works instantly, this increases security,” he explained, sitting down with Wired at HOPE 9 to talk about Cryptocat, activism and getting through American airports.
Cryptocat Adventure! from Nadim Kobeissi on Vimeo.
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
The reality of the Cambridge Analytica/Facebook scandal is far more sinister than a loss of personal privacy.
And this time there's "much less public scrutiny," writes Trevor Timm at The Guardian.
The bill, which would have penalized companies that refuse to cooperate with the government over encrypted phones, did not go to a vote.
The controversy over encryption has been one of the biggest public debates of the year so far, yet the Democratic presidential candidates have been largely silent on the subject.
WhatsApp, an online messaging service owned by Facebook, has over a billion users -- and as of Tuesday, any exchanges done via the app will be encrypted.
Although the year-long, concerted effort of hundreds of journalists is an admirable feat, their analysis may be overlooking crucial evidence involving corruption by Western corporations and billionaires.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.