Coal Terminal Averted in Washington State?
Four progressives won seats this month on the council in Whatcom County, where coal interests have ambitions to put a $600 million international terminal whose exports would add 86.7 million tons of CO2 to the atmosphere.
Four progressives won seats this month on the council in Whatcom County, where coal interests have ambitions to put a $600 million international terminal whose exports would add 86.7 million tons of CO2 to the atmosphere.
The candidates’ victory makes construction of the Gateway Pacific Terminal, which if permitted would export almost 50 million tons of coal per year from the site 20 miles north of Bellingham, Wash., less likely. The project requires multiple permits from state and federal agencies, but the seven-member Whatcom County Council also has to grant one.
Lou Dubose of The Washington Spectator reports:
Four council seats were on November’s ballot. When I was in Bellingham in September, reporting on the coal terminal, several environmental activists I talked [to] predicted a flood of corporate contributions that would support a pro-coal council slate.
… An environmental coalition, working through the Washington Conservation Voters Action Fund, raised $621,000. The pro-terminal Save Whatcom PAC raised $165,000, mostly from coal interests.
And all four progressive candidates won, which doesn’t seal the fate of the Gateway terminal but makes its passage less likely.
… Environmental advocacy groups are aren’t closing up shop in Whatcom County yet. But there is a bigger story. Whatcom County was one episode in a regional export terminal blockade in a region that Bullitt Foundation President Denis Hayes has referred to as “Cascadia”—the Northwest corner of the United States and British Columbia, where citizens and elected officials have dedicated themselves to the defense of the environment.
The fight now moves south to the Morrow Pacific terminal on the Columbia River in Oregon. Already Portland neighborhoods are studded with “Gov. Kitzhaber: Save us from Dirty Coal” yards signs.
The smart money has chastened coal interests cranking up their spending, as their prospects for moving Western coal out of Pacific Northwestern ports are diminished.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
WAIT, BEFORE YOU GO…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
On November 8, 2018, I was trapped in my car as embers fell all around me in Paradise, California, and the thought that kept going through my head was, “This can’t be the same fire [that had been reported 10 miles away only two hours before]. Fires can’t move like that.” I should know: I […]
Scientists say they see no end to the way human-caused climate change is adversely affecting the planet.
As the climate crisis worsens, one of its biggest culprits is getting too hot for many former backers.
The world's top emitter of greenhouse gases is also a principle market for solar panels, wind turbines and electric vehicles.
It files formal notice on the first day it could do so; the process takes a year. Critics call it a reckless failure of leadership.
The method is proved and essential to prevent the rise of global average temperatures, scientists say.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.