Britons: ‘Spy on Us’
A 51 percent majority of British citizens support an invasive "snooping" bill according to a new poll, while 42 percent said the government should be able to break the law to conduct surveillance in the name of preventing terrorism.
A 51 percent majority of British citizens support an invasive “snooping” bill, while 42 percent said the government should be able to break the law to conduct surveillance in the name of preventing terrorism.
The findings come from a poll conducted for The Huffington Post UK. They constitute the first major survey of the British public’s opinion since The Guardian published leaked details of the U.S. National Security Agency’s PRISM surveillance program.
The proposed law, known as the Communications Data Bill, would grant security and intelligence services access to the mobile phone and Internet records of British citizens. Just 38 percent of those polled by research firm YouGov said the legislation “goes too far” and “undermines our privacy.”
Women were likelier than men to support the bill, by a difference of almost two to one.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Wait, before you go…The Huffington Post:
However, despite the overall backing for the ‘snooping’ measures, support was far smaller than for previous civil liberties battlegrounds, 90-day detention and control orders, [YouGov President Peter] Kellner said.
“These are early days in an argument that may well rumble on for months, even years,” he said.
“Indeed, the trade-off between security-driven rules and individual liberty will, and should, be something that we never stop debating.”
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
In the real-life version of the dystopian novel "1984" we seem to be caught in, Trump is our very own idiosyncratic version of Big Brother.
Some of the darkest secrets of the U.S. national security establishment are exposed in the upcoming book "In the Shadows of the American Century."
The best literary precedent for what we're enduring now is not the absolute order of Big Brother but the irrational eruptions of King Lear.
On Tuesday, a federal appeals court found that the Wikimedia Foundation had standing to argue that the National Security Agency was violating its First and Fourth Amendment rights by spying on its users' communications.
A recent hearing by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform reviewed law enforcement use of facial recognition technology and got some troubling information.
I suspect we're about to have the screw-you presidency of all time, far surpassing George Orwell's vision. And believe me, that will prove to be dystopian beyond compare -- or do I mean beyond despair?
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.