Ashcroft Defends Waterboarding at House Hearing
Discussing the use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday, former Attorney General John Ashcroft said he didn't think waterboarding constituted torture and that the technique produced "very valuable" reports. He was testifying on the Bush administration's interrogation rules.
Discussing the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday, former Attorney General John Ashcroft said he didn’t think waterboarding constituted torture and that the technique produced “very valuable” reports. He was testifying on the Bush administration’s interrogation rules.
Rock Solid JournalismCNN:
Testifying on the Bush administration’s interrogation rules before the House Judiciary Committee, Ashcroft defended the technique while answering a question from Rep. Howard Coble, R-North Carolina.
“Waterboarding, as we all know, is a controversial issue. Do you think it served a beneficial purpose?” the congressman asked.
“The reports that I have heard, and I have no reason to disbelieve them, indicate that they were very valuable,” Ashcroft said, adding that CIA Director George Tenet indicated the “value of the information received from the use of enhanced interrogation techniques — I don’t know whether he was saying waterboarding or not, but assume that he was for a moment — the value of that information exceeded the value of information that was received from all other sources.”
[…] “I believe a report of waterboarding would be serious, but I do not believe it would define torture,” Ashcroft said, responding to questions from Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California.
In 2026, amid chaos and the nonstop flurry of headlines, Truthdig remains independent, fact-based and focused on exposing what power tries to hide.
Support Independent Journalism.
Courts & Law
She's now assistant AG for civil rights but is intent on reversing civil rights.
Editorial Cartoons
Courts & Law
How the FBI’s new co-deputy director used his prior office to wage a culture war in Missouri.
TD Column
History will not remember the outgoing attorney general kindly.
It falls short of first recommendation after extraordinary Justice Department actions in case involving lying to Congress in Russia probe.
Trailblazing California attorney general and senator failed to attract attention and cash with what was seen as an inconsistent message.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.