A Question of Trust
A recent study from the University of California, Berkeley, reports that people who are more easily embarrassed may also be more trustworthy.
A recent study from the University of California, Berkeley, reports that people who are more easily embarrassed may also be more trustworthy.
The authors of the study said that embarrassment, not to be confused with shame, is “the emotional signature of a person to whom you can entrust valuable resources.”
But the sample size — 60 college students — was small, and the report seems to prompt more questions than answers. For instance, is embarrassment an indicator that a person is more worthy of trust, or that a person is more likely to be trusted? And is someone who easily turns red someone you really want to trust with your secrets? — BF
Wait, before you go…Medical Xpress:
Researchers point out that the moderate type of embarrassment they examined should not be confused with debilitating social anxiety or with “shame,” which is associated in the psychology literature with such moral transgressions as being caught cheating.
While the most typical gesture of embarrassment is a downward gaze to one side while partially covering the face and either smirking or grimacing, a person who feels shame, as distinguished from embarrassment, will typically cover the whole face, Feinberg said.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
A new book about the 1969 battle in Berkeley is striking in its implications for a military takeover in an ostensibly democratic society.
The Truthdig columnist and author has been awarded for his sterling contributions to American literature.
University of California journalism professor Edward Wasserman argues that the media has abandoned a basic commitment to the First Amendment.
Two young women from Berkeley watched their assailant walk free in 2008. State Sen. Connie Leyva wants to make sure it never happens again.
The famous whistleblower discusses his new book, "The Doomsday Machine," and the terrible price we are still paying for the Cold War.
Ismael Chamu refuses to let an inhumane housing system keep him from his dreams of a better life for his parents and siblings, his future partner and himself.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.