Weasel Words vs. Truth in the Gray Lady
New York Times public editor Arthur Brisbane asked in a blog whether reporters should more aggressively challenge the truth of statements made by political figures in its news pages. Readers gave him an earful. (more)
New York Times public editor Arthur Brisbane asked in a blog whether reporters should more aggressively challenge the truth of statements made by political figures in its news pages. Readers gave him an earful. Most respondents said that, of course, the paper’s job is to report and print the truth.
But Brisbane’s question makes sense from a more nuanced newsroom perspective, writes Guardian contributor Clay Shirky. A statement about President Obama made by Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney alluded to a claim without making it head on. It’s that kind of “weasly” remark that Brisbane was curious about.
But as Shirky says, the question looks ludicrous from the readers’ perspective: “Readers do not care about the epistemological differences between lies and weasel words; we want newspapers to limit the ability of politicians to make dubious assertions without penalty.” –ARK
Your support matters…The Guardian:
Brisbane (who, as public editor, speaks only for himself, not the Times) referred to two recent stories: the claim that Clarence Thomas had “misunderstood” a financial reporting form when he left out key information, and Mitt Romney’s assertion that President Obama gives speeches “apologising” for America. Brisbane asked whether news reporters should have the freedom to investigate and respond to those comments.
The reaction from readers was swift, voluminous, negative and incredulous.
“Is this a joke? THIS IS YOUR JOB.”
“If the purpose of the NYT is to be an inoffensive container for ad copy, then by all means continue to do nothing more than paraphrase those press releases.”
“I hope you can help me, Mr Brisbane, because I’m an editor, currently unemployed: is fecklessness now a job requirement?”
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Wounds of War
Does a single photo or video of violence carry the Vietnam-era power to shock, or has scrolling produced a “numbing sameness’?
Africa
The war-torn country faces the destruction of its health infrastructure, widespread displacement and hunger.
Courts & Law
Some say the ruling points to a disconnect between what it takes for survivors of sexual violence to be believed and what the legal system demands.
Books
In 'Knife,' his memoir on narrowly surviving a vicious attack, the acclaimed author interrogates a world where liberal principles have become old-fashioned.
Ear to the Ground
With summer on the way, advocates say access to cool air amidst stifling heat is a constitutional right.
Film
In “I Am Gitmo,” French director Philippe Diaz recreates the torture rooms inside the Guantanamo Bay Detention Center.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.