Former Republican Officials Are Proposing a Carbon Tax—and It’s a Good Idea
A GOP-conceived tax is win-win: less carbon in the atmosphere and more equal distribution of income.
Rubí Flórez / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
By Robert Reich / RobertReich.org
A group of former Republican officials (including James A. Baker, Henry Paulson, George P. Shultz, Marty Feldstein and Greg Mankiw) is proposing a carbon tax starting […] at $40 per ton, that would gradually increase.
The proceeds of the tax would be distributed to every American.
The average family of four would receive $2,000 annually in dividends. As the tax rises, so would their dividends. Since everyone would receive the same amount of revenue from the tax regardless of their income level, the dividend would make a bigger difference for poorer families than for wealthier ones.
It’s a win-win: Less carbon in the atmosphere, and more equal distribution of income.
That it’s being proposed by Republicans doesn’t make the idea any less worthy.
I’m aware that some on the left would rather use revenues from such a tax to invest in clean energy and other social causes rather than return the revenues directly to the public. That detail can be worked out.
The idea is getting a hearing in the White House. And in these dreadful times, that’s good news indeed.
Your support matters…Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Economic Justice
The tax credits are too complicated and trade warriors are blocking cheaper Chinese models.
Editorial Cartoons
Health & Wellness
More and more people are choosing a diet that is focused on reducing one's environmental footprint.
Editorial Cartoons
Dig
Absent from most public and policy conversations is any acknowledgement of the possibility that renewable energy cannot power a high-consumption civilization. This series will explore mounting evidence that a major downshift in consumption is looming — and explore the implications of this energy realism for human progress and flourishing.
Environment
Among the most notable countries with lacking ambition are China and the United States.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.