The president’s U.N. speech shows that his policies are the same as the neocon strategies of George W. Bush and liberal intervention of Barack Obama.
America's top brass in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, sat down for a talk with the Financial Times last week about his strategy in the South Asian nation, how long he thinks U.S. troops will remain there and the possibility of the Taliban's participation in the Afghan government.
What's the right way for a top general to advise the president about wartime strategy? What if his recommended strategy is potentially at odds with the president's preferred course of action? Gen. Stanley McChrystal ran up against these questions in recent days, and not everyone in Washington thinks he handled his part in the matter appropriately.
The Obama administration is reconsidering its Afghanistan strategy in light of Gen. Stanley McChrystal's startling "mission failure" warning. It's unclear whether the White House will go along with McChrystal's call for up to 40,000 more troops -- but the general is apparently going to go ahead with his request over the next few days.
The war in Afghanistan should weigh heavy on the public's mind, given the recent increase in troop levels and grumblings from high military officials about the manner in which the war is being fought. Now there's news that a NATO airstrike has killed 90 people, 40 of them believed to be civilians, in the northern part of the country.
The president has frustrated his anti-war base with plans to escalate the war in Afghanistan, but he told "60 Minutes" on Sunday that he's not looking to stay indefinitely: "What we can't do is think that just a military approach in Afghanistan is going to be able to solve our problems So what we're looking for is a comprehensive strategy And there's got to be an exit strategy".