Why It’s So Hard to Catch—or Even Count—Fake Immigration Lawyers
Christopher Bailey needed to hire an immigration lawyer – but he didn’t have the luxury of comparison shopping.
The Jamaican-born cook was in immigration detention after overstaying his tourist visa, and he wanted to fight to stay with his family in the United States. While Bailey was locked up, his mother paid $8,000 to George Cameron, a man she knew had taken immigration cases for folks in Philadelphia’s Jamaican community.
Cameron helped Bailey get out of detention, and represented him in his first hearing before an immigration judge. After that hearing, Cameron told Bailey not to return to court.
Cameron promised he’d handle Bailey’s case without him. Bailey decided to take his attorney’s advice. His court date came, and he stayed home.
“You have a lawyer, you’re supposed to trust your lawyer, right?” he said.
What Bailey didn’t know, and what a federal jury heard at a trial earlier this year, was that Cameron also failed to show for the hearing. Bailey was ordered deported in absentia; he got his deportation notice in the mail and, he said, he never saw Cameron again.
Last year, Bailey’s mother sent him a news story that explained it: Cameron wasn’t a lawyer after all.
For at least 25 years, Cameron had solicited clients and argued before immigration judges in Philadelphia, New York and Chicago. But he had no law license, nor had he completed law school. In his firm, “Cameron, Cameron and Associates,” he had no associates. And the three Philadelphia-area offices he advertised were, in fact, his home, his girlfriend’s home, and a post office downtown.
Worse, Cameron had been convicted twice in Pennsylvania for pretending to be a lawyer. But he kept taking clients like Bailey anyway, until federal authorities raided his home in March 2015. In February, he was convicted yet again, after jurors heard tape of Cameron stumbling through immigration hearings and, in Bailey’s case, failing to appear. At his sentencing scheduled for July, he faces decades in federal prison.
But Bailey, whose tale of misfortune helped convict Cameron, said investigators never contacted him directly. As soon as he heard the charges against Cameron, he wanted to make a report. But, he said, “I don’t know where to go to start the complaint.”
Bailey is still in the country, working two jobs to raise money to pay a new lawyer to reopen his case. Recouping the $8,000 his mother paid Cameron would help, but he has no idea how to make that happen.
“Everything comes down on me,” he said. “I want to open up my case. But I can’t because of money issues.”
Fraud in immigration law is an old problem, and the fight to stop it is decades old, too. Bailey’s case illustrates one of the greatest challenges: Fraud victims just don’t know where to report the crime. That makes it hard to catch fraudsters, and hard to track the scope of the problem.
“Lawyers and community organizations have known about this issue – notario scams and immigration fraud – for a very long time,” said Prof. Juan Manuel Pedroza, who teaches sociology at University of California at Santa Cruz. “The issue was: Is there way we can figure out where it’s happening and where the prevalence is really high? We’re not there yet.”
Pedroza recently completed his doctoral work at Stanford University, and his dissertation explored the huge variance in the distribution of immigration law fraud complaints to the Federal Trade Commission. Since 2011, the agency has maintained a category for tips about immigration law fraud. Pedroza filed a Freedom of Information Act request for all 2,300 complaints from 2011 to 2014, then looked for trends in the geographical distribution.
One takeaway from his research: Counties with stronger support networks for immigrants produced more legal fraud complaints to the FTC.
That doesn’t mean there’s more fraud in those places, Pedroza said. Across the country, there are far more people being defrauded than people filing a complaint – as Bailey’s case illustrates. In places with strong support networks, immigrants are more likely to know how to make a complaint, and more willing to trust the government to handle their case.
“The sense that you can go to a protective arm of the government, and your information won’t get shared” with immigration authorities, Pedroza said, “that sell is easier in San Francisco, Colorado or Los Angeles.”
Pedroza singled out two counties where the opposite is true: Madera County, California, and Cameron County, Texas both have large immigrant populations but sent almost no fraud complaints to the FTC.
Anne Schaufele, an attorney with Project END at the Washington-based nonprofit Ayuda, helps victims file fraud reports to the FTC as well as with local agencies. Police and local prosecutors usually are more willing to take action on the most common complaints. Federal prosecutors, she said, are focused on long-running, multi-state operations like Cameron’s fraudulent law practice.
“They’re looking for big cases,” Schaufele said. “A lot of notario fraud happens small-scale, so we see the same actor harming the community over lots of years.”
She said that coming forward to report fraud, like other crime, comes with extra risks in the Trump era. ICE has access to the FTC’s complaint database, she said, so she advises people not to include personal information if they’re at risk for deportation.
In the past, Department of Homeland Security officials told ICE agents and prosecutors to weigh a person’s “status as a victim, witness or plaintiff in civil or criminal proceedings” when deciding who to pursue. Under President Donald Trump, though, everyone eligible for deportation is fair game.
That’s a big risk to take when the odds of catching the fraudster, let alone recouping the money you paid, are so long.
“A lot of databases feel like black holes in practice,” Schaufele said, “because you see so little enforcement around these issues.”
This story was originally published by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit news organization based in the San Francisco Bay Area. Learn more at revealnews.org and subscribe to the Reveal podcast, produced with PRX, at revealnews.org/podcast.Wait, before you go…
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.Support Truthdig
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.