UAV Industry to Journalists: Don’t Call Them ‘Drones’
Leaders of the unmanned aerial vehicle industry instructed journalists at a conference this week in Washington, D.C., to stop using the word "drone" to refer to the terrifying flying robots the government uses to monitor and kill people.
Leaders of the unmanned aerial vehicle industry instructed journalists at a convention this week in Washington, D.C., to stop using the word “drone” to refer to the terrifying flying robots the government uses to monitor and kill people.
Inside the media room Wednesday at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center, where the sector’s top trade group — the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International — was meeting, the password to connect to the Wi-Fi network was the not-so-subtle phrase “DontSayDrones.”
The group’s president, Michael Toscano, said the word “drone” conjures up mental images of Predators firing missiles at alleged terrorists around the world. “If you look around here today, you don’t see that,” The Washington Times quotes him as saying.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Wait, before you go…The Washington Times:
Indeed, the showroom at the convention is filled with smaller craft that in the coming years will be used by farmers, oil and gas companies, first responders, the news media and a host of other industries.
Mr. Toscano also contended that the phrase “unmanned aerial system” more accurately describes the craft, which consists not just of a flying machine but also of data links, payloads and, most importantly, a human operator.
“The key word is the word ‘systems.’ That’s the word we hope the public will understand,” he said. “There is a human being in the system. The human being is what makes the system. When you say the word ‘drone,’ you don’t think of a human being in control. That’s the real reason why” not to use the word “drone,” he said.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
The president’s foreign policy seldom matches his anti-war rhetoric. In 2020, it’s incumbent on his opposition to offer a true alternative.
There’s a lot about our wars that we don’t know, but what we do know is enough to make a person cry.
The president's 2020 opponents would do well to watch his moves on the international front, as they could help his re-election cause.
America’s wars are increasingly waged from the air, a reality that makes the prospect of ending them ever more daunting. But what’s pushing this process?
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.