U.S. and Iran Agree to Iraq Meeting
Washington and Tehran have agreed to temporarily set aside their differences and meet in Baghdad for limited talks on the security of Iraq. The surprise move comes amid rising tensions between the two nations, which have been publicly taunting each other in recent days.Washington and Tehran have agreed to temporarily set aside their differences and meet in Baghdad for limited talks on the security of Iraq. The surprise move comes amid rising tensions between the two nations, which have been publicly taunting each other in recent days.
Your support matters…AP via SFGate:
The U.S. and Iran said Sunday they will hold upcoming talks in Baghdad about improving Iraq’s security — a historic political turnabout for the two countries with the most influence over Iraq’s future.
Expectations of progress remain low, however, with tough issues at stake and mutual suspicions running high. Even as it announced the talks, Iran lashed out at Vice President Dick Cheney’s weekend warnings about its nuclear program, saying it would retaliate if the U.S. attacked it.
Yet the two sides said they were setting aside such differences to focus on a narrow issue — Iraq’s continued violence and sharp political deterioration.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Editorial Cartoons
How is it that a story written 150 years ago manages to speak to the many moments at which it’s been reimagined for moviegoers?
Donald Trump may be the single most impeachable president in our nation's history. Why are Democrats even wasting time deliberating?
The Nation's Jeet Heer reflects on the growing support for impeachment, its potential pitfalls and the political battles it will define.
The president's recent talk of a "coup" has fueled rampant speculation about how he might respond if he were to lose the 2020 election.
In her latest book, Juliana Spahr explores what radical literature has done to challenge forms of nationalism in the U.S. and reaches a disappointing conclusion.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.