U.K. Courts to Journalists: Stow It
Parliamentary official John Hemming has drawn attention to a new type of court order forbidding members of Britain's fourth estate to cover cases deemed too sensitive for public consideration The order, known as a super-injunction (more).Parliamentary official John Hemming has drawn attention to a new type of court order forbidding members of Britain’s fourth estate to cover cases deemed too sensitive for public consideration. The order, known as a super-injunction, promises legal consequences — including possible jail time — for journalists daring to ask the wrong questions or even report a restriction’s existence.
Details on the injunction that prompted Hemming’s criticism were not forthcoming. — ARK
Wait, before you go…The Guardian:
An MP who is launching an inquiry into excessive and possibly unlawful court secrecy says a new type of gagging order is hampering the work of investigative journalists.
John Hemming said the new breed of injunction, which was used in relation to a case in the high court in London last week, meant journalists could face jail simply for asking questions.
This goes a step further than preventing people speaking out against injustice,” said Hemming, the Liberal Democrat MP for Birmingham Yardley and a longtime campaigner against secrecy. “It has the effect of preventing journalists from speaking to people subject to this injunction without a risk of the journalist going to jail. That is a recipe for hiding miscarriages of justice.”
… There has been growing concern over the use of gagging orders in UK courts. It is not known precisely how many superinjunctions have been issued, but an informed legal estimate is that as many as 20 have been granted in the UK over the last 18 months.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Politics
A Tale of Two Elizabeths, One Joe, One Donald, and Us.
Although Britain's divorce terms have been approved, huge uncertainties surround the future.
Three-plus years after voters approved the referendum, the United Kingdom is on course to leave the European Union next week.
She calls the summit of senior family members "constructive" in dealing with the pair's controversial plan to step back from royal duties.
Canadian, Australian and British leaders announce similar intelligence conclusions about the deaths of all 176 people on board.
The couple's stunning statement says they plan to become financially independent and split their time between the U.K. and North America.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.