Twitter Ordered to Turn Over Occupy Protester’s Tweets
A judge in Manhattan ruled Monday that Twitter must turn over some three months' worth of data from the account of an Occupy Wall Street protester who is being prosecuted on charges of disorderly conduct.
A judge in Manhattan ruled Monday that Twitter must turn over some three months’ worth of data from the account of an Occupy Wall Street protester who is being prosecuted on charges of disorderly conduct. The New York City district attorney’s office wants the tweets to determine if Malcolm Harris, a senior editor at The New Inquiry, was aware of police orders he allegedly violated.
“If you post a tweet, just like if you scream it out the window, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy,” Manhattan Criminal Court Judge Matthew A. Sciarrino Jr. said in his ruling.
However, Sciarrino also said he would review the Twitter data from Harris’ account and hand over only relevant portions.
“This is a big deal,” American Civil Liberties Union staff attorney Adam Fine said back in May. “It is so important to encourage those companies that we all increasingly rely on to do what they can to protect their customers’ free speech and privacy rights.”
— Posted by Tracy Bloom
Your support matters…The Associated Press via The Washington Post:
Harris was among more than 700 people arrested in the Brooklyn Bridge march. Police said demonstrators ignored warnings to stay on a pedestrian path and went onto the roadway. Harris, an editor for an online culture magazine, and others say they thought they had police permission to go on the roadway.
He challenged the subpoena for his tweets, saying the timespan was unreasonably broad, and although the messages were sent publicly, seeking the accompanying user information violated his privacy and free association rights. The data could give prosecutors a picture of his followers, their interactions through replies and retweets, and his location at various points, Stolar said.
… Then San Francisco-based Twitter went to court on Harris’ behalf, saying he had every right to fight the subpoena. Its user agreements say that users retain rights to content they post and can challenge demands for their records, and it would be “a new and overwhelming burden” for Twitter to have to champion such causes for them, the company argued in a court filing.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Arts & Culture
When you weren’t looking, four anonymous eyeballs changed your world.
The 2020 head count is the first in which most people are being encouraged to answer the questions online.
State official says information being mined at schools includes locations, websites visited, videos watched, passwords and contact lists.
A lot of new technology is expected for this year's once-in-a-decade count. Experts and watchdogs sound the alarm about potential mayhem.
House panel members use the opportunity to grill the CEO on company's track record on civil rights, hate speech, privacy and misinformation.
The U.S. can allow internet providers to play favorites but has no legal authority to stop bans by California and others, ruling says.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.