Top Court Reinstates Trump’s Travel Ban, Will Hear Arguments
Protesters wave signs and chant against President Trump's travel ban outside a Seattle federal courthouse in May. (Ted S. Warren / AP)
By Mark Sherman / Associated Press
Protesters wave signs and chant against President Trump’s travel ban outside a Seattle federal courthouse in May. (Ted S. Warren / AP)
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is letting the Trump administration mostly enforce its 90-day ban on travelers from six mostly Muslim countries, overturning lower court orders that blocked it.
The action Monday is a victory for President Donald Trump in the biggest legal controversy of his young presidency.
The court did leave one category of foreigners protected, those “with a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States,” the court said in an unsigned opinion.
The justices will hear arguments in the case in October.
Trump said last week that the ban would take effect 72 hours after being cleared by courts.
The ban would apply to citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
The Trump administration said the ban was needed to allow an internal review of the screening procedures for visa applicants from those countries. That review should be complete before October 2, the first day the justices could hear arguments in their new term.
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Courts & Law
Special counsels, like those examining Biden’s and Trump’s handling of classified documents, are only independent on paper.
Politics
The official report of the Congressional investigation into the January 6 attack on the Capitol, featuring a foreword by Ari Melber, makes a compelling case for a sustained and wide-ranging conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.
Politics
The committee ends its historic investigation of a failed presidential coup.
Courts & Law
Will Merrick Garland and Jack Smith succeed where Bill Barr and Robert Mueller failed?
Politics
A Tale of Two Elizabeths, One Joe, One Donald, and Us.
Politics
More disciplined reporting would benefit the American people.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.