The Bradley Defect
The latent racism that many had predicted would cut into Barack Obama’s poll numbers on Election Day — the so-called “Bradley effect” — ended up largely an unfounded concern, as exit polls showed him picking up 43% of white voters, an increase of 4 percentage points over what Democratic candidates have averaged since 1968.
Wait, before you go…
The Globe And Mail:
After a campaign in which the colour of Barack Obama’s skin was a relentless undercurrent, the Democratic contender laid to rest the fear that a historic night would be tainted by racial prejudice.
Mr. Obama got 43 per cent of the white vote, according to exit polls. Since Lyndon Johnson’s 1964 election, Democratic nominees only averaged 39 per cent.
There had been much talk of the so-called Bradley effect, named after Tom Bradley, the black candidate in the 1982 California governor’s race whose polling lead vanished on election day.
Instead, Mr. Obama’s performance showed that anxieties about the economy and the direction of the country prevailed over reluctance about electing the first biracial president.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.Support Truthdig