The Best Watchdog Journalism on Obama’s National Security Policies
By Blair Hickman and Cora Currier, ProPublica
This collection originally appeared at ProPublica.
Inspired by The New York Times’ expose on Obama’s “secret 2018kill list,'” we collected some of the best pieces of watchdog journalism on Obama’s national security policies. For a good introduction, and to see how they’ve evolved since Bush, see our timeline.
ON OBAMA’S WAR ON TERROR
Getting Bin Laden, New Yorker, August 2011
Twenty-three Navy SEALs, one Pakistani-American translator and a dog named Cairo: Nicholas Schmidle’s gripping narrative brings to life the night they killed Bin Laden, as well as the hunt that led to the end of the man Obama had dubbed a top national security priority. ProPublica reporter Dafna Linzer also recommended this Time article (paywalled) as a seminal piece on the hunt for Bin Laden.
Secret 2018Kill List’ Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will, New York Times, May 2012
Obama’s hands-on counterterrorism record means that he, in effect, is “personally overseeing the shadow war with Al Qaeda.” But some officials criticize his tactics 2013 like a formula for counting civilian deaths that may significantly lower the actual numbers.
Inside the Killing Machine, Newsweek, February 2011
In 2011, at the time of this article’s writing, the American public knew the military used drones to kill suspected terrorists. But the formal process of deciding who should be hunted and killed had never been reported 2013 until Tara Mckelvey snagged an exclusive interview with a man at the CIA who approved these “lethal operations.”
The Rise of the Killer Drones: How America Goes to War in Secret, Rolling Stone, April 2012
In war, soldiers used to have to point a gun at the enemy to kill. Today, they simply have to push a button from a station on their base, what some say is like playing a video games. This piece is one of the most in-depth looks we found on the rise of the U.S. drone program, and how it’s changed the way we fight. And for everything else you ever wanted to know about drones, see our guide.
CIA Shifts Focus to Killing Targets, The Washington Post, August 2011
The number of employees at the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center has ballooned from 300 in 2001 to about 2,000 in 2011, representing a fundamental shift in the agency’s focus: from gathering intelligence to operations meant to locate, target and capture or kill.
Cyber-Intruder Sparks Massive Federal Response–And Debate Over Dealing With Threats, Washington Post, December 2011
The military discovered in 2008 that malware, borne on somebody’s thumb-drive, had infiltrated their classified network. The resulting investigation set off a battle over the rules of engagement for cyber warfare, finally restricting the military to defending its own networks and not crossing into civilian or other federal agencies’ turf.
Top Secret America: A Hidden World, Growing Beyond Control, Washington Post, July 2010
Since September 11th, the United States’ intelligence operations have ballooned. An estimated 854,000 people hold top-security clearances, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington D.C., and comprise part of a network so sprawling that it’s sometimes hard for top officials to keep track of it all.
The National Security Agency’s under-construction data center in Utah (dubbed, aptly, the Utah Data Center) will cost $2 billion and sprawl over 1 million square feet, more than five times the size of the U.S. Capitol. When it’s done, slated for September 2013, it will be “the country’s biggest spy center.” And part of its duties may be to monitor your personal data.
ON PROSECUTING LEAKS:
The Secret Sharer, New Yorker, May 2011
Though Obama trumpeted the value of whistle-blowers when he entered office, he’s also launched an aggressive crackdown on government leaks. The case of Thomas Drake, a former senior executive at the National Security Agency, is a prime example of the tension between whistle-blowers who reveal wrongdoing and leaks that jeopardize national security.
Sealing Loose Lips: Obama’s Crackdown on Leaks, ProPublica, March 2012
Our timeline of leak prosecutions under the Espionage Act 2013 and how they’ve picked up steam under Obama.
ON THE MIDDLE EAST AND AFGHANISTAN
In Yemen, U.S. Airstrikes Breed Anger, and Sympathy for Al Qaeda, Washington Post, May 2012
The Obama administration has escalated airstrikes in Yemen against high-ranking al Qaeda leaders, but is it an effective military strategy in the long run? This article describes the backlash in Yemen against civilian deaths and what’s seen as an incursion on their sovereignty.
U.S. Not Reporting All Afghan Attacks, The Associated Press, April 2012
An A.P. exclusive found the military doesn’t report non-fatal attacks on coalition troops by Afghan policemen and soldiers, even though the incidents are an important indication of the level of mistrust between Afghan and coalition troops. A military spokesman says this is due to differences in policy between coalition governments on reporting attacks.
2 Top Lawyers Lost to Obama in Libya War Policy Debate, New York Times, June 2011
Obama rejected the views of top Pentagon and Justice Department lawyers when he decided to continue America’s role in the air war in Libya without Congressional authorization 2013 a legal, but “extraordinarily rare” move. According to Dafna, this is one of the most significant national security stories of Obama’s presidency, having “more to do with war power and executive authority than anything else.”
Congratulations, you finished! Now test your knowledge by taking our quiz: Obama vs. Bush on National Security.Wait, before you go…
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.Support Truthdig