Supreme Court Gives Green Light to Trump’s Ban on Transgender Service Members
"We will all keep fighting to take down this discriminatory ban," declares ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio.
A protest outside the White House against the trans military ban in 2017. (Ted Eytan / Flickr Creative Commons).
In a decision LGBTQ rights advocates immediately denounced as an “awful attack” on the rights of transgender Americans, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority on Tuesday gave a green light to President Donald Trump’s widely condemned ban on transgender people serving in the military.
While one nationwide injunction against the ban remains in effect—meaning Trump’s policy cannot yet be implemented—Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern noted that the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling makes it likely that the remaining injunction will “soon be reversed.”
“This is heartbreaking and temporary,” declared ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, expressing hope that Trump’s ban will be defeated in the lower courts. “We will all keep fighting to take down this discriminatory ban. In court, at the ballot, and through our transformation of public discourse and understanding.”
The impact of SCOTUS action on trans military cases:
1. Legally – 1 nationwide injunction is still in place. So ban not yet in effect.
2. Practically – This is an awful attack on trans people and we will keep fighting.
Your “both sides” takes on trans existence are not wanted.
— Chase Strangio (@chasestrangio) January 22, 2019
It’s deeply upsetting that the Supreme Court lifted blocks on the trans military ban that were secured by two lawsuits while federal courts continue to review.
It did NOT lift the nationwide block secured in our case, Stone v. Trump, which is before a court in Maryland.
— ACLU (@ACLU) January 22, 2019
“Disgusting, shameful, bigoted, cruel. Trans people have the right to exist, to serve, to live with dignity,” added LGBTQ rights advocate and writer Lauren Rankin. “This is frightening indication of what’s to come from this far-right Supreme Court.”
Trump’s initial plan, unveiled in 2017, would have completely barred transgender individuals from serving in the military, but several courts ruled that the proposal was unconstitutional.
As the Washington Post notes, the plan the Supreme Court approved on Tuesday—devised by former Defense Secretary James Mattis—would “bar those from the military who identify with a gender different from their birth gender and who are seeking to transition. Mattis’s plan makes exceptions, for instance, for about 900 transgender individuals who are already serving openly and for others who would serve in accordance with their birth gender.”
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Many of those accosted by police during the tactic's surge in New York, 80% of whom were black or Latino, remain psychologically affected.
Though diversity is a driving ethos of this year's event in Los Angeles, the art world is still deeply invested in sidelining people of color.
The Democratic presidential candidate attributes the financial crisis to discriminatory housing practice as opposed to predatory lending.
“The way you get the guns out of the kids’ hands is to throw them up against the walls and frisk them.”
The directive, not yet in effect. called for allowing clinicians to refuse participation in services like abortions based on their beliefs.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.