Supreme Court Deals a Body Blow to Guantanamo
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled Thursday that detainees at Guantanamo Bay have a right to trial in civilian courts. As Justice Anthony Kennedy of the majority wrote, "The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times." It has been widely speculated that such a ruling would ultimately force the closure of the detention facility.
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled Thursday that detainees at Guantanamo Bay have a right to trial in civilian courts. As Justice Anthony Kennedy of the majority wrote, “The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times.” It has been widely speculated that such a ruling would ultimately force the closure of the detention facility.
Your support matters…Washington Post:
President Bush’s slow and painful schooling in constitutional law continued today as the Supreme Court ruled for the third time in four years that he had violated a basic precept of the American legal system.
The court ruled 5-4 that Bush cannot deny prisoners at Guantanamo Bay the right to challenge their detentions in federal district court. Some of them have been held already — without charges — for more than six years.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the court, determined that the prisoners in the U.S.-run facility “have the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus. … ”
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
TD Original
Without serious institutional reforms, a Republican minority will continue to control the White House, the Senate and the Supreme Court.
TD Original
The extreme right takes 22 out of 50 seats on a committee to rewrite the constitution.
Courts & Law
It is not a new phenomenon. Americans have always cared passionately about the Supreme Court.
Americas
Throughout Chile’s constitutional process, elites have opposed Indigenous demands in defense of the status quo.
Dig
This Dig investigates the political and ideological capture of the Supreme Court by the GOP and its dark-money donors. After chronicling the legal doctrine of "originalism" and its influence in pulling the country backwards, this series explores how Americans can reclaim the Court in the name of our rights, our liberties, and our democracy.
TD Original
How the Supreme Court was remade in the image of the original Originalist.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.