Supreme Court: Class Action Lawsuits Are a Privilege, Not a Right
There is a takeaway message from this latest devastating ruling by the Supreme Court, which says there is nothing wrong with giving corporations the power to prevent cheated consumers from banding together to mount class action lawsuits, and it is this (more).
There is a takeaway message from this latest devastating ruling by the Supreme Court, which says there is nothing wrong with giving corporations the power to prevent cheated consumers from banding together to mount class action lawsuits, and it is this: Corporate interests are on a slash-and-burn campaign against any sort of collective action on the part of the American people. –YL
Wait, before you go…Los Angeles Times:
The Supreme Court gave corporations a major win Wednesday, ruling in a 5-4 decision that companies can block their disgruntled customers from joining together in a class-action lawsuit. The ruling arose from a California lawsuit involving cellphones, but it will have a nationwide impact.
In the past, consumers who bought a product or a service had been free to join a class-action lawsuit if they were dissatisfied or felt they had been cheated. By combining these small claims, they could bring a major lawsuit against a corporation.
But in Wednesday’s decision, the high court said that under the Federal Arbitration Act companies can force these disgruntled customers to arbitrate their complaints individually, not as part of a group. Consumer-rights advocates said this rule would spell the end for small claims involving products or services.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Courts & Law
A little-noticed 9-0 decision points ominously toward a post-parody culture.
TD Original
Meet the scholars-for-hire who preach solidarity in service of a software company with a long and sordid record of collaboration.
Politics
ESG is called “woke capitalism” by the right and “greenwashing” by the left. But to most investors, it’s just common sense.
Economic Justice
The move would disrupt the influence of UNOS, the contractor whose control of organ sharing has been nearly all-encompassing for decades.
Technology
A flood of new satellites could lead to the destruction of the ozone layer.
Economic Justice
Twenty of the world’s biggest food corporations paid $53.5 billion to their shareholders over the past two years.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.