Sudanese Women Whipped for Wearing ‘Indecent’ Pants
Lubna Ahmed Hussein went to jail on principle. The Sudanese journalist didn't feel she should have to pay a fine for wearing pants that a court ruled indecent. She was lucky. Twelve other women were lashed for the same offense.
Lubna Ahmed Hussein went to jail on principle. The Sudanese journalist didn’t feel she should have to pay a fine for wearing pants that a court ruled indecent. She was lucky. Twelve other women were lashed for the same offense. — PS
Strong Journalism, Rooted in TruthAFP via Yahoo:
Women in trousers are not a rare sight in Sudan but the authorities can take offence at trousers which reveal too much of a woman’s shape, leading to accusations from rights groups that judgement is arbitrary.
In Hussein’s case, the court opted for the 500 Sudanese pounds (200 dollars) fine rather than a flogging, but ten of the 12 other women who were arrested in a Khartoum restaurant at the same time as Hussein have been whipped for their offence.
Truthdig remains committed to deep reporting that challenges power and brings hidden stories to the surface.
Support independent journalism.
Courts & Law
Many federal courts are more politically diverse and less ideologically doctrinaire than the present SCOTUS.
If the Democrats' impeachment action fails to address the "constitutional rot" that has occurred over decades, U.S. democracy may be doomed.
The 44th president failed in foreign policy and saw a rise in racial tensions: The "Hope and Change" candidate could not deliver.
The collapse of our democratic institutions began long before the arrival of Trump, who is capitalizing on the evisceration of the rule of law.
The struggle—far from finished—was never as finite or clear-cut as the myth that persists in our collective memory.
Court statements veered from the scientist's original conclusions in at least three cases.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.