Study: Over Half of Americans Think CIA Torture Methods Revealed in Senate Report Are Justified
How are we ever going to learn from our mistakes when we won't even admit they were errors at all?
Shutterstock
Shutterstock
How are we ever going to learn from our mistakes when we won’t even admit they were errors at all? That’s the question that comes to mind when looking at the Pew Research Center’s recent national survey about the CIA’s interrogation methods.
Maybe the 51 percent of Americans who think CIA interrogation methods were justified missed the part of the report that explains how ineffective the tactics were. Or at least they must have missed the part that describes the torture. Sadly, that seems like wishful thinking.
Following the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on CIA interrogation practices in the period following the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, 51% of the public says they think the CIA methods were justified, compared with just 29% who say they were not justified; 20% do not express an opinion.
The new national survey by the Pew Research Center, conducted Dec. 11-14 among 1,001 adults, finds that amid competing claims over the effectiveness of CIA interrogation methods, 56% believe they provided intelligence that helped prevent terrorist attacks, while just half as many (28%) say they did not provide this type of intelligence.
Partisan divides on these questions are wide. A large majority of Republicans (76%) say the interrogation methods used by the CIA after 9/11 were justified. Democrats are divided – 37% say the methods were justified, while 46% disagree. About twice as many liberal Democrats (65%) as conservative and moderate Democrats (32%) say the CIA’s interrogation techniques were not justified.
Read More.
—Posted by Natasha Hakimi Zapata
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Ear to the Ground
Reports of rampant sexual abuse pile up at Langley headquarters.
Interview
How Kissinger and the CIA bolstered the regime of Augusto Pinochet for years—until they couldn’t.
TD Original
A comprehensive review of the U.S. role in the 1973 coup of Salvador Allende and its aftermath.
A closer look at the Trump administration's agreement with the Taliban reveals all the president's concerned with is bragging rights.
In a new episode of "On Contact," the Truthdig columnist argues that Britain and the U.S. are "mocking the very concept of the rule of law."
The U.S. government has labeled a journalist and publisher an "enemy of the people." Anyone familiar with history knows how this story ends.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.