Senate Democrats Delay Sessions’ Confirmation Amid Concerns Rule of Trump Will Trump Rule of Law
By Lauren McCauley / Common DreamsUpdated 2 p.m. EDT:
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee invoked a procedural move called the two-hour rule—which, according to The Hill, prevents “holding committee meetings beyond the first two hours of the Senate’s day”—to push the attorney general vote until Wednesday.
The move stalls the controversial confirmation of Sen. Jeff Sessions and came at the same time that Democrats on other key committees boycotted hearings for Treasury Secretary nominee Steven Mnuchin and Rep. Tom Price’s nomination to be secretary of health and human services, forcing Republicans to reschedule both votes.
At the same time that U.S. President Donald Trump made clear that whoever leads the U.S. Department of Justice would be forced to uphold the Rule of Trump over Rule of Law, Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday held a tense debate over the pending confirmation of Jeff Sessions.
Tuesday’s hearing was held hours after acting AG Sally Yates was fired by Trump for refusing to enforce an immigration order she deemed unlawful. Ironically, during Yates’ 2015 deputy AG confirmation hearing, Sessions had specifically asked her: “If the views the President wants to execute are unlawful, should the attorney general or the deputy attorney general say no?”
Watch the exchange below:
But growing concern that Sessions himself would act as “rubber stamp” for Trump and his policies—as well as his record of opposing rights for women, minorities, and the LGBTQ community—were the basis of many questions during Tuesday’s committee hearing, and has sowed fear among those concerned over the troubling consolidation of power within the new administration.
Before voting against his confirmation, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) called out Sessions’ troubling devotion to Trump and noted that even Trump’s senior advisor Stephen Bannon called Sessions the “administration’s clearing house for policy and philosophy.”
That quote came from an email to Washington Post reporters Philip Rucker and Robert Costa, who on Monday declared Sessions the “intellectual godfather…of Trump’s hard-line actions.”
“The early days of the Trump presidency have rushed a nationalist agenda long on the fringes of American life into action—and Sessions, the quiet Alabamian who long cultivated those ideas as a Senate backbencher, has become a singular power in this new Washington,” they wrote:
From immigration and health care to national security and trade, Sessions is the intellectual godfather of the president’s policies. His reach extends throughout the White House, with his aides and allies accelerating the president’s most dramatic moves, including the ban on refugees and citizens from seven mostly Muslim nations that has triggered fear around the globe.
The author of many of Trump’s executive orders is senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, a Sessions confidant who was mentored by him and who spent the weekend overseeing the government’s implementation of the refugee ban. The tactician turning Trump’s agenda into law is deputy chief of staff Rick Dearborn, Sessions’s longtime chief of staff in the Senate. The mastermind behind Trump’s incendiary brand of populism is chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon, who, as chairman of the Breitbart website, promoted Sessions for years.
During Tuesday’s debate, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) similarly pointed out that “Trump repeatedly referred to Sessions as ‘my Attorney General,'” to which she added: “How could we possibly conclude that this nominee will be independent?”
Indeed, ahead of the hearing, a coalition of progressive organizations had petitioned committee chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) to delay the scheduled vote until Sessions clarified his stance on the temporary ban on citizens from seven predominantly Muslim countries.
The hearing was met with numerous disruptions from protesters, including from former U.S. Army colonel and CODEPINK activist Anne Wright, who was arrested after speaking out.
Protester brings a copy of Michelle Alexander’s “New Jim Crow” to Sessions confirmation hearing pic.twitter.com/knrPMfd5ch
— Jeff Stein (@JStein_Vox) January 31, 2017
Another person dragged out of #Sessions hearing, yells “I love this country and I don’t support Jeff Sessions”
— Mary Emily O’Hara (@MaryEmilyOHara) January 31, 2017
More than 100 ppl outside the hearing room for Senator Sessions as the Senate Judiciary committee meets. Huge, packed crowd
— Jeff Stein (@JStein_Vox) January 31, 2017
Meanwhile, outside the Dirksen Senate Office Building where the hearing was held, protesters rallied against Sessions and vowed retribution against lawmakers who backed his nomination.
– Voting Rights Act
– Violence Against Women Act
– Hate Crime Prevention Act
– Fair Pay Act
Jeff Sessions voted against all of them. pic.twitter.com/i6oFgz8Nwy
— Democracy Awakening (@DemAwakening) January 31, 2017
“I think it’s clear that this administration is picking a fight with the American citizenry and the citizenry is making it clear that we’re not backing down; we’re not relenting,” Brooks said.
Widespread opposition to Trump’s cabinet, particularly Sessions, and anger over what many has perceived as lackluster resistance on the part of Democratic lawmakers has pushed many party leaders to preemptively announce they would not vote for his approval.
Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer announced in a Facebook post on Monday that he would not vote for Sessions, among other nominees. Confronted by angry constituents, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse late Sunday also said Sessions would not get his vote.Wait, before you go…
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.Support Truthdig