Right Aims Its Wrath at Sanctuary Cities
As the U.S. Justice Department preps for a federal case against Arizona's controversial SB 1070 anti-immigrant law, many supporters of the bill are accusing the federal government of intentionally overlooking the more than 40 "sanctuary cities" that have popped up around the country.
As the U.S. Justice Department preps for a federal case against Arizona’s controversial SB 1070 anti-immigrant law, many supporters of the bill are accusing the federal government of intentionally overlooking the more than 40 “sanctuary cities” that have popped up around the country.
“Sanctuary cities” — locales including Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and New York City that do not deport undocumented immigrants — explicitly refuse to inquire about one’s immigration status or report immigration issues to federal authorities. –JCL
Your support is crucial…Los Angeles Times:
Critics of the Obama administration’s decision to sue Arizona over its new law to control illegal immigration accuse the government of overlooking a more obvious target: the dozens of cities that called themselves a “sanctuary” for immigrants.
“Everyone has noticed the hypocrisy of the government going after Arizona and ignoring the sanctuary cities,” said Bob Dane, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform. “They have it exactly backwards. Arizona is applying federal law, and sanctuary cities are violating it.”
Justice Department lawyers on Thursday asked a judge in Phoenix to block Arizona’s law from going into effect on the grounds it interferes with federal immigration policy. The law is due to take effect in the coming week.
With an uncertain future and a new administration casting doubt on press freedoms, the danger is clear: The truth is at risk.
Now is the time to give. Your tax-deductible support allows us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes what’s really happening — without compromise.
During this holiday season, stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and ensure the stories that matter are told.
Editorial Cartoons
Editorial Cartoons
Women
The ruling by the Arizona Supreme Court claims the Civil War-era law, which prevents the termination of a pregnancy even in cases of rape or incest, must stand.
Will it be the corporate establishment or working people? How the Massachusetts senator chooses could determine the Democratic nomination.
A new investigation finds the former Trump adviser used a private jet owned by a wealthy Chinese businessman during the midterm elections.
This marks the first time waivers have applied to federal procurement rules. Previously ones waived environmental impact reviews.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.